Solve Solid Compressability Homework Problem Involving Copper Block

  • Thread starter Thread starter dacruick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solid
dacruick
Messages
1,038
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Hello, I have a problem involving a copper block of mass .25kg. They have a given compressibility due to pressure change, and compressibility due to temperature change. They give the density for copper as well. They tell you that the pressure changes from P1 --> P2 isothermally.

It then asks what the amount of heat leaving the system is
The work done on the copper block
and the total change in internal energy


Homework Equations






The Attempt at a Solution



what I've done already is figured out the volume change due to the pressure change.

Using this volume change I can theoretically find the work done using -nRT*ln(Vf/Vi). The only problem is I don't have a value for the moles. I could find it if i had the molar mass of copper, but I don't, and this is a practice exam problem.

If i assume that because temperature change is 0, the change in internal energy is 0. Then heat will equal negative work. but i have a strong feeling this is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In an isothermal process, the work done is simply the pressure times the change in volume, i.e.
<br /> W = P\Delta V<br />
Does that help?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top