Solve Surface Charge Density & He Atom Potential Energy Questions

Taryn
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
I still don't understand from the msg given... another explanation any1

Hey I have two questions... the first one I did I got wrong but am really unsure why... I used sigma=Q/A but didnt get the right answer...
I got that the answer was 1.3277E7 but I am so far off it aint funny!
Please could someone help!
The answer is meant to be 117.5! I don't know tho!

Consider a cell whose cell membrane is 4.7 nm thick and whose resting potential is 62.4 mV. What is the approximate surface charge density (in µ C/m2) on the outside wall of the cell?

Also this question also has me stumped!
Consider the helium atom which consists of two electrons orbiting a nucleus made up of two protons and two neutrons. If both electrons are at a distance of r = 4.5 × 10-11 m away from the nucleus, as in figure, what is the potential energy (in eV) of the helium atom? Treat the nucleus as pointlike. - Give answer to 4 significant figures.

I thought you'd just find the energies of the electron on the helium atom which I got was 1.024E-17 and add them but obviously you don't so if anyone knows wat to do I would be much appreciative, I really just needa know how to do it... or even just a general start!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
um yeah its cool now... for the first question... I just forgot to times it by 8.85E-12... so if anyone knows wat I am doing wrong for the second one... the help would be great
 
Taryn said:
Consider the helium atom which consists of two electrons orbiting a nucleus made up of two protons and two neutrons. If both electrons are at a distance of r = 4.5 × 10-11 m away from the nucleus, as in figure, what is the potential energy (in eV) of the helium atom? Treat the nucleus as pointlike. - Give answer to 4 significant figures.

I thought you'd just find the energies of the electron on the helium atom which I got was 1.024E-17 and add them but obviously you don't so if anyone knows wat to do I would be much appreciative, I really just needa know how to do it... or even just a general start!
Start with a nucleus of +2e and no electrons. Move an electron from infinity to r = 4.5x10-11 m away from the nucleus. Now you have an atom of +e. Move another electron from infinity to r. The work done in moving both electrons is the potential energy of the two electrons.

AM
 
I don't understand how that really helps... I know that, but still don't understand where I am goin wrong... could someone help me understand... this is wat I did!
P.E=kqq'/r and then added up wat I got... except I just can't get the right answer?
so does this mean I use the force of a charge and times it by the distance.. your explanation I mean... but that still doesn't work... The answer is meant to be 112 but I can't get that no matter how hard I try
 
Taryn said:
I don't understand how that really helps... I know that, but still don't understand where I am goin wrong... could someone help me understand... this is wat I did!
P.E=kqq'/r and then added up wat I got... except I just can't get the right answer?
so does this mean I use the force of a charge and times it by the distance.. your explanation I mean... but that still doesn't work... The answer is meant to be 112 but I can't get that no matter how hard I try
I get:

PE_1/e = k2e/r = 8.989e9*2*(1.602e-19)/(4.500e-11) = 64.00 eV

PE_2/e = ke/r = 8.989e9*(1.602e-19)/(4.500e-11) = 32.00 eV

So the total potential energy is 96.00 eV.

This is a simplified view of it since it assumes that the electron charge is concentrated at the centre. But it should be very close.

AM
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top