Solve the Pendulum Beam Problem with Simple Equations | Homework Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhyzicsOfHockey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the pendulum beam problem, where a uniform steel beam swings with a period of 1.10 seconds. The initial attempt to calculate the length using the simple pendulum formula is incorrect because it assumes a point mass at the end, while the beam's mass is distributed along its length. To solve the problem accurately, one must derive the correct formula for a physical pendulum, taking into account the moment of inertia and the center of mass. The gravitational force acts at the center of mass, which complicates the calculation. Understanding these principles is essential for finding the correct length of the beam.
PhyzicsOfHockey
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



On the construction site for a new skyscraper, a uniform beam of steel is suspended from one end. If the beam swings back and forth with a period of 1.10 s, what is its length?

Homework Equations



T=2*pi*sqroor (L/g)

The Attempt at a Solution



(1.1/(2*3.14))^2*9.81=L

L=.3007m

This is wrong however and I don't understand why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhyzicsOfHockey said:

Homework Statement



On the construction site for a new skyscraper, a uniform beam of steel is suspended from one end. If the beam swings back and forth with a period of 1.10 s, what is its length?

Homework Equations



T=2*pi*sqroor (L/g)

The Attempt at a Solution



(1.1/(2*3.14))^2*9.81=L

L=.3007m

This is wrong however and I don't understand why.
The period equation you have written is for a simple pendulum with a point mass at the end. You cannot use it for this case, since the mass is uniformly distributed along the beam. You must find or derive the correct formula for this case.
 
This is the case of physical pendulum. The gravitational force acts at centre of mass and u can assume a point mass hanging there and then calculate.
 
no, you will need the moment of inertia of the steel rod as well
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top