Solve Trampoline Question: Jump from 10m & 20m Height

  • Thread starter Thread starter vpv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trampoline
AI Thread Summary
A 60 kg person jumping from a height of 10 m stretches a trampoline by 1.0 m, while the question explores how much it would stretch from a height of 20 m. The discussion emphasizes the conservation of energy, equating gravitational potential energy before the jump to elastic potential energy after landing. Participants clarify that the trampoline's spring constant (k) must account for the force exerted during the jump, including acceleration. The correct application of energy equations leads to the conclusion that the trampoline will stretch 1.4 m when the person jumps from 20 m. Understanding the relationship between potential and elastic energy is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
vpv
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 60 kg person jumps from a platform onto a trampoline 10 m below, stretching it 1.0 m from its initial position. Assumin that the trampoline behaves like a simple elastic spring, how much will it stretch if the same person jumps from a height of 20 m?


Homework Equations


Law of Conservation of Energy
Ek = 0.5mv^2
Eg = mgh
Ee = 0.5kx^2
Fx = kx

The Attempt at a Solution


Really didn't understand the question at all. I figured since the guy is jumping of the platform, velocity at that instance would be 0. If the guy landed on the trampoline, his velocity would be 0 (but i don't know about this). The equillibrium of spring is 0 when the guy jumps of platform so there is no elastic potential. I am guessing there is some gravitational potential as the platform is above the trampoline. But I am consistently getting the wrong answer. The answer is 1.4 m. How would you get that?

Thanks, I appreciate the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you start by writing out an equation representing the principle of conservation of energy?
 
Ek1 + Eg1 + Ee1 = Ek2 +Eg2 +Ee2
0.5mv1^2 + mgh1 + 0.5kx1^2 +FaD = 0.5mv2^2 + mgh2 + 0.5kx2^2 +FfD
 
vpv said:
Ek1 + Eg1 + Ee1 = Ek2 +Eg2 +Ee2
0.5mv1^2 + mgh1 + 0.5kx1^2 +FaD = 0.5mv2^2 + mgh2 + 0.5kx2^2 +FfD
I think you're over-complicating things a little here. If we ignore air resistance, then there are no dissipative forces present and therefore the total energy of the system must remain constant.

So, what type of energy does the system posses before the person jumps and what type of energy does the system posses after the person has landed on the trampoline?
 
Hootenanny said:
I think you're over-complicating things a little here. If we ignore air resistance, then there are no dissipative forces present and therefore the total energy of the system must remain constant.

So, what type of energy does the system posses before the person jumps and what type of energy does the system posses after the person has landed on the trampoline?

Um before the person jumps, he possesses gravitational potential, no? and after he lands, the spring possesses elastic potential.
I think.
 
vpv said:
Um before the person jumps, he possesses gravitational potential, no? and after he lands, the spring possesses elastic potential.
I think.
Correct :approve:. So, can you put what you just said in equation form?
 
mgh1 = 0.5kx2^2

but how do i find K?
I tried Fg/x which is 588 N/m. I don't know if that is correct tho Caz using that K value, I get a final answer of 6.3 m which is not even close to the answer at the back. Maybe the answer at the back is wrong?
 
vpv said:
mgh1 = 0.5kx2^2?
That would be correct. Can you now apply this equation to the two cases:

(1) Where the person jumps from 10m
(2) Where the person jumps from 20m
 
Hootenanny said:
That would be correct. Can you now apply this equation to the two cases:

(1) Where the person jumps from 10m
(2) Where the person jumps from 20m

Two words.

You're a Genius.
Wait that's three.

But I want to know why I can't find the k value the way I did. I used Fg/x to find K. Can you tell me what I did wrong?
 
  • #10
vpv said:
Two words.

You're a Genius.
Wait that's three.
:blushing:
vpv said:
But I want to know why I can't find the k value the way I did. I used Fg/x to find K. Can you tell me what I did wrong?
Note that the force exerted by the spring not only opposes the weight of the trampolinist, but must also account for the acceleration of the trampolinist.
 
  • #11
AcceleratioN?? How does he accelerate? Do you mean that he decelerates as he lands on the trampoline and his V = 0?
 
  • #12
vpv said:
AcceleratioN?? How does he accelerate? Do you mean that he decelerates as he lands on the trampoline and his V = 0?
Yes, acceleration is simply a change in velocity - when the speed is increasing or decreasing is irrelevant. Generally in kinematics, one simply talks about acceleration rather than deceleration as things can get a little confusing.
 
Back
Top