Solve Tricky Homework Problem: Ice Flake Speed in Hemispherical Bowl

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves a 1.90 g ice flake released from the edge of a 15.0 cm radius hemispherical bowl, where the contact is frictionless. To find the speed of the flake at the bottom, the Conservation of Energy principle is applied, equating the initial potential energy to the final kinetic energy. The potential energy is calculated using the height from which the flake falls, and as it descends, this energy converts entirely into kinetic energy. If a second flake with double the mass is used, its speed at the bottom remains the same due to the conservation of energy principles, as mass cancels out in the equations. Understanding these energy transformations is crucial for solving similar physics problems.
lbofin1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
In this problem, a 1.90 g ice flake is released from the edge of a hemispherical bowl whose radius r is 15.0 cm. The flake-bowl contact is frictionless.
a) What is the speed of the flake when it reaches the bottom of the bowl?
(b) If we substituted a second flake with twice the mass, what would its speed be?

*Our teacher gave us these problems and they are from a totally different book than we are using, and we haven't been able to find any examples like this in our book. We don't even know where to begin..*
Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This problem can be easily soved with a simple application of Conservation of Energy.

Energy the flake has at the beginning (before it it dropped) = the Energy at the end (when it reaches the bottom of the bowl)

The ice flakes "Total" energy = Kinetic Energy + Potential Energy

The flake starts off with all its energy being potential, and no kinetic since it is not moving. When the flake gets to the bottom of the bowl, all that potential energy is converted into Kenitic energy.
change in KE = Change in PE

KE = 1/2 mv^2
PE = mgh

m is the mass, v is the velocity, g is the gravitational acceleration, and h is the height.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top