Solving a Belt and Pulley Question Using Simple Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Idrees27
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Belt Pulley
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a belt and pulley problem using the equation (g(M-m))/(M+m) to find the magnitude of force, which resulted in 6 kN. The original poster questions the validity of their approach, noting difficulty in finding similar examples online. Respondents express confusion about the equation's origin and suggest calculating the net force on the pulley by vectorially adding tension forces instead. Clarification is sought regarding the masses involved and their relevance to the problem. The conversation emphasizes the need for a clearer understanding of the forces at play in the pulley system.
Idrees27
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I am working on a simple belt and pulley question, as pictured below.

4a7b0128.jpg


To find the magnitude, I used the following equation:

(g(M-m))/(M+m)

So,

9.81(2500-600)/(2500+600) = 6.01 - Answer = 6kN

Is this correct, or am I doing it totally wrong? I have searched for the same question but didn't find any like this with a single pulley, all other examples seem to show 2 pulleys.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Idrees27 said:
To find the magnitude, I used the following equation:

(g(M-m))/(M+m)
I don't understand that expression. Where did you get it? (Are m and M masses?)

In any case, why not just find the net force on the pulley due to the belt tension? Add up those tension forces vectorially.
 
Doc Al said:
I don't understand that expression. Where did you get it? (Are m and M masses?)

In any case, why not just find the net force on the pulley due to the belt tension? Add up those tension forces vectorially.
Yes, they are masses. That's a formula I found via Google.

How would you attempt the whole question?
 
Idrees27 said:
Yes, they are masses. That's a formula I found via Google.
Masses of what? How is that relevant?
How would you attempt the whole question?
Do as I suggested in my last post.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top