Solving a Puzzling Problem: Equal and Opposite Forces on a Rod

  • Thread starter Thread starter conquerer7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Rod
AI Thread Summary
In a system where equal and opposite forces are applied to a uniform rod on a frictionless surface, the net external force is zero, leading to no translational motion of the center of mass. However, the rod will rotate around its center of mass due to the applied forces creating torque. This results in angular momentum despite the center of mass remaining stationary. The confusion arises from the expectation of translational motion, which does not occur because the net force acting on the rod is zero. Ultimately, the rod experiences rotation without any movement of its center of mass.
conquerer7
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Here's a dumb question I came up with that I'm not seeing the answer to.

For any system of particles, F_ext = M a_cm. Consider a uniform rod lying on a frictionless surface:

-----------^
----------------
--------------v

Equal and opposite forces are exerted on the rod where the ^ and v are. The net external force is zero, so the center of mass, which is at the center of the rod, does not move. But obviously it would move if you applied those forces, right? The whole thing would rotate around a point between the two points of application.

I'm probably making a really stupid mistake in thinking about this, so some help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think that they have a different point of application? Both force vectors act at the center of mass.

-------^ N
-------|--------
-------v Fg

Or are you referring to some other forces, not the weight and the normal?
 
Last edited:
Nope, no weight and normal. This is a top-down view and I apply those two forces myself by, say, tapping the rod there.
 
conquerer7 said:
Nope, no weight and normal. This is a top-down view and I apply those two forces myself by, say, tapping the rod there.

If you only give two taps at those points ,the final result will be a rotation about the center of mass along with a translational motion of the center of mass. Since you have a torque the rod will gain angular momentum .The motion of the rod exactly when the forces are applied is probably a mathematical mess.
 
Where does the translational motion of the CM come from? The net force is zero, so the acceleration of the CM should be zero as well, right?
 
Right. The center of mass wouldn't move, and the rod would rotate about it. That might not match up with what you intuitively think will happen, but that's what happens.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top