Solving an Equality in Quantum Mechanics: Help Needed!

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi

Please take a look at the following equality found in my book:

<br /> \left| \mu \right\rangle = \sum\limits_v {\left| v \right\rangle \left\langle {v}<br /> \mathrel{\left | {\vphantom {v \mu }}<br /> \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace}<br /> {\mu } \right\rangle } = \sum\limits_v {\left\langle {\mu }<br /> \mathrel{\left | {\vphantom {\mu v}}<br /> \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace}<br /> {v} \right\rangle ^* \left| v \right\rangle } <br />

The asterix denotes complex conjugation. I cannot see why the second equality holds, since

<br /> \sum\limits_v {\left\langle {\mu }<br /> \mathrel{\left | {\vphantom {\mu v}}<br /> \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace}<br /> {v} \right\rangle ^* \left| v \right\rangle } = \sum\limits_v {\left\langle {v}<br /> \mathrel{\left | {\vphantom {v \mu }}<br /> \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace}<br /> {\mu } \right\rangle \left| v \right\rangle } \ne \sum\limits_v {\left| v \right\rangle \left\langle {v}<br /> \mathrel{\left | {\vphantom {v \mu }}<br /> \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace}<br /> {\mu } \right\rangle } <br />

What am I missing here?


Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you think the last equality holds? You're just writing <v|u>, which is a number, behind |v> instead of in front of it.
 
Yeah, you are right. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top