Solving Angular Momentum Problem: Dividing by L/4 Explained

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a conservation of angular momentum problem involving a bullet striking a rod, causing it to spin. The key point is that to calculate the angular momentum, the linear momentum of the bullet is multiplied by L/4, where L is the distance from the rod's center of mass to the point of impact. This multiplication reflects the relationship between linear and angular momentum, as the bullet's momentum contributes to the system's total angular momentum. It is clarified that the bullet retains some linear momentum after impact, and the angular momentum is calculated based on the bullet's position relative to the rod's center of mass. Understanding this relationship is crucial for solving problems involving collisions and rotational motion.
paki123
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I got a homework problem the other day, and it was a conservation of angular momentum problem. Basically a bullet hits a rod, and a rod starts to spin. I needed to find how fast the rod was rotating.

I didn't get the answer right, but I was looking up the answers, and it says that to convert it to the angular momentum, I had to divide my linear momentum by l/4(because the bullet strikes the rod l/4 over the center of mass.)

So it looked like this:

P = Linear Momentum = M(b)*V(b) + M(r)*V(r)

AM =Angular Momentum = (I(b)+I(r))*ω

P*L/4 = AM and then solve for ω
Why does dividing by L/4 get me to Angular momentum?

Or was initial momentum suppose to be covering linear momentum and angular momentum?

So Initial Momentum should have been (initial Linear momentum + initial Angular momentum )
and Final Momentum should have been (final linear momentum + final angular momentum)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer you've shown seems that it would only apply if the bullet completely stops after impact with the rod, a somewhat elastic collision. If the bullet continues to move after impact (including getting imbedded into the rod), then part of the angular and linear momentum of the system composed of bullet + rod remains in the bullet.

If the bullet completely stops, then it's linear momentum equals the impulse the bullet imparts to the rod. You can then treat the problem as an impulse applied to the rod at a point 1/4 the length of the rod away from the rod's center of mass.
 
I forgot to mention that. You are right, the bullet does get embedded into the rod. But I'm still not getting the intuition of why L/4 is being multiplied. Is there any connection between linear and angular momentum?
 
paki123 said:
P*L/4 = AM and then solve for ω
Why does dividing by L/4 get me to Angular momentum?
It's multiplying and not dividing.
P*L/4 is the angular momentum of the bullet (in respect to the center of mass) right before collision. What you have there is conservation of angular momentum for the collision.
You don't need to "convert" linear momentum to angular momentum. The bullet has both.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top