Solving Argand Diagram: Finding z + w = -4+3i

  • Thread starter Thread starter thereddevils
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Argand Diagram
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the equation z + w = -4 + 3i, where the argument of z/(1-i) is given as pi/2. It is established that the argument of z is -3pi/4, indicating that z lies in the third quadrant. Participants explore methods to find the least value of |z + 4 - 3i|, suggesting that z can be expressed in terms of a parameter along the line y = x in the third quadrant. The conversation also touches on the properties of logarithms and arguments in complex numbers, with various approaches to calculating distances between points and lines. The thread concludes with discussions on alternative methods, including trigonometry and calculus, to solve the problem effectively.
thereddevils
Messages
436
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given that arg(z/(1-i))=pi/2, find the argument of z.

Sketch , in the Argand diagram , the set of points representing z and the point representing the complex number w=-4+3i. Hence deduce the least value of |z+4-3i|

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Let z=a+bi

Rationalising z/(1-i)=(a-b)/2+(a+b)/2 i

negative pi/2 suggest that the point is on the negative y-axis.

tan pi/2 = [(a-b)/2]/[(a+b)/2]

hence a=b

And since (a+b)/2 is negative, a<0 , b<0

so z=a+ai or b+bi

(a,a) is in the third quadrant, and the argument of z is -3pi/4

I have no problem in sketching. The problem i have is with the last part.

Any pointers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given that arg(z/(1-i))=pi/2...
...negative pi/2 suggest that the point is on the negative y-axis.

So which is it, \pi/2 or -\pi/2?

You can solve the first faster and easier by using arg\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)=arg(a)-arg(b)

The least value of |z+4-3i| is saying what point z where arg(z)=\frac{-3\pi}{4} thus z=a(1+i), a<0 is closest to the point (-4+3i)? If you think about this in cartesian coordinates, z lies on the line y=x where x<0. Now all you have to do is find out the closest distance between the point (-4,3) and the line y=x.
The problem could even be simplified using logic since we know the line connecting the shortest distance between z and the point is at right angles so the gradient of the line is -1.
 
Mentallic said:
So which is it, \pi/2 or -\pi/2?

You can solve the first faster and easier by using arg\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)=arg(a)-arg(b)

Is this the property of arguments? Looks to be similar to the property of logs.

The least value of |z+4-3i| is saying what point z where arg(z)=\frac{-3\pi}{4} thus z=a(1+i), a<0 is closest to the point (-4+3i)? If you think about this in cartesian coordinates, z lies on the line y=x where x<0. Now all you have to do is find out the closest distance between the point (-4,3) and the line y=x.
The problem could even be simplified using logic since we know the line connecting the shortest distance between z and the point is at right angles so the gradient of the line is -1.

thanks Mentallic.
 
thereddevils said:
Is this the property of arguments? Looks to be similar to the property of logs.

It sure does :smile:

If you want to prove it, let x=r cis\theta and y=Rcis\phi and then rationalize x/y and use some properties of trigonometry to simplify it down.
 
It is precisely a "property of logarithms" because the argument of a complex number is a property of exponentials.

Write complex number a, with magnitude r_1 and argument \theta_1, in the form r_1e^{i\theta_1} and the complex number b, with magnitude r_2 and argument \theta_2, in the form r_2e^{i\theta_2}.

Then
\frac{a}{b}= \frac{r_1e^{i\theta_1}}{r_2e^{i\theta_2}}= \frac{r_1}{r_2}\frac{e^{i\theta_1}}{e^{i\theta_2}}= \frac{r_1}{r_2}e^{i(\theta_1- \theta_2)}}

That is, the magnitude of a/b is r_1/r_2 and its argument is \theta_1- \theta_2.
 
And another student discovers the miracles of Euler's formula.
 
HallsofIvy said:
It is precisely a "property of logarithms" because the argument of a complex number is a property of exponentials.

Write complex number a, with magnitude r_1 and argument \theta_1, in the form r_1e^{i\theta_1} and the complex number b, with magnitude r_2 and argument \theta_2, in the form r_2e^{i\theta_2}.

Then
\frac{a}{b}= \frac{r_1e^{i\theta_1}}{r_2e^{i\theta_2}}= \frac{r_1}{r_2}\frac{e^{i\theta_1}}{e^{i\theta_2}}= \frac{r_1}{r_2}e^{i(\theta_1- \theta_2)}}

That is, the magnitude of a/b is r_1/r_2 and its argument is \theta_1- \theta_2.

Thanks Hallsofivy, and wow how long have you been on this forum?You have made 27000 posts!
 
Is the answer for the least value sqrt(53/2) ?
 
No not quite. Show us what you did.
 
  • #10
Mentallic said:
No not quite. Show us what you did.

I drew a diagram, with right angled triangle WOZ. Using the perpendicular gradients,

(a/a)((3-a)/(-4-a))=-1

a=-1/2

Then i proceed to find the distance between (-4,3) and (-1/2,-1/2) which gives that answer.
 
  • #11
Ok so you set up your question properly, you just used the distance formula incorrectly.

d=\sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}

Where (x_1,y_1)=(-1/2,-1/2) and (x_2,y_2)=(-4,3)

I can think of some other ways to solve this problem which might be of interest to you.

So we have d=\sqrt{(x-4)^2+(y+3)^2} to denote the distance from the point(4,-3) to a circle's circumference with that centre and radius d. We also have the equation y=x so if we plug y into the distance equation and simplify we get d=\sqrt{2x^2-2x+25} but we want to find the minimum distance so we want the minimum value of the quadratic under the sq.root. Just use some calculus and you'll find x=1/2, which can be substituted back into the distance equation to give you the answer.
 
  • #12
Mentallic said:
Ok so you set up your question properly, you just used the distance formula incorrectly.

d=\sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}

Where (x_1,y_1)=(-1/2,-1/2) and (x_2,y_2)=(-4,3)

I can think of some other ways to solve this problem which might be of interest to you.

So we have d=\sqrt{(x-4)^2+(y+3)^2} to denote the distance from the point(4,-3) to a circle's circumference with that centre and radius d. We also have the equation y=x so if we plug y into the distance equation and simplify we get d=\sqrt{2x^2-2x+25} but we want to find the minimum distance so we want the minimum value of the quadratic under the sq.root. Just use some calculus and you'll find x=1/2, which can be substituted back into the distance equation to give you the answer.

thanks Mentallic, it can also be solved using trigonometry and vectors.
 
  • #13
Yep, and if you go back to precalculus class they would be using a specific distance formula for the distance between a point and a line :wink:

By the way, I have no idea why this was moved to the precalc forum.
 
  • #14
thereddevils said:
Thanks Hallsofivy, and wow how long have you been on this forum?You have made 27000 posts!

I started last night and, boy, are my fingers tired!:smile:
 
  • #15
Halls, an average of 10 posts per day for the passed 7 years... umm... just one question. Assuming you have to take a break once a year or so, for christmas maybe :wink: how many posts have you made on your big days? I'm suspecting you spammed the general forum like hell :-p
 
Back
Top