Solving coupled differential equations for spin-1/2 in a B-field

HBarker
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(Sorry, I don't know how to use latex)

Solve the TDSE for a spin half nucleus in a B-field where B_z = B0, B_y= B1 cos(ωt) and B_x = B1 sin(ωt).
Use vector and matrix representation. You will get coupled differential equations for a and b, look for solutions of the form a = a_0 ω_a e^(i ω_a t) and b = b_0 ω_b e^(i ω_b t)

Homework Equations



|ψ> = column vector (a,b)

The Attempt at a Solution

I've done all of the problem but have got stuck trying to find the solutions in the form a = a_0 ω_a e^(i ω_a t) and b = b_0 ω_b e^(i ω_b t)

I have (da/dt) = (-i \gamma t /2) (B_0 a + B_1 b e^(-i \omega t) )

(db/dt) = (i \gamma t / 2 ) (B_0 b + B_1 a e^(i \omega t ) )

but don't know how to separate them. My lecturer gave me the hint that the equations have to hold at all times, not just time = t, so I tried using t=0, getting rid of the exponentials, but that didn't help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
these eqn can be made algebraic by using just the differential of a(t) and b(t) which you have just written.
 
Can yo ugive me a hint at how to start with that though? I have no idea what to do
 
you can put value of a(t)=a0e(iωat) and similarly for b(t) in the differential eqn. and you can see after that there is only algebraic eqn to solve.you can put t=o after to get those a0 and others.It seems you are doing something wrong so check out your calculation.You can see feynman lectures vol. 3 for similar problems although solved.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top