Solving derivative- possible without quotient rule?

Persimmon
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


find the following derivative
d/dx [g(x + 1)(√(2+ (x + 8)^(1/3))/(cos(tan(sin(tan(sin x))))]
at x = 0

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I split the big long derivative into 3 functions:
a(x) = g(x + 1)
b(x) = √(2+ (x + 8)^(1/3))
c(x) = cos(tan(sin(tan(sin x))))

and got : (a'x*bx + b'x*ax)(cx)-c'x*px*qx)/cx^2
subbing in x = 0 that simplified into 2*g'(1)
but it was mentioned that it's possible to solve this without the quotient rule. I can't figure out how you would solve this derivative if you didn't use the quotient rule.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Persimmon said:

Homework Statement


find the following derivative
d/dx [g(x + 1)(√(2+ (x + 8)^(1/3))/(cos(tan(sin(tan(sin x))))]
at x = 0

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I split the big long derivative into 3 functions:
a(x) = g(x + 1)
b(x) = √(2+ (x + 8)^(1/3))
c(x) = cos(tan(sin(tan(sin x))))

and got : (a'x*bx + b'x*ax)(cx)-c'x*px*qx)/cx^2
subbing in x = 0 that simplified into 2*g'(1)
but it was mentioned that it's possible to solve this without the quotient rule. I can't figure out how you would solve this derivative if you didn't use the quotient rule.
Instead of dividing by cos(...), you can multiply by sec(...). That way you're set up to use the product rule.

BTW, your notation is not very helpful.
a'x*bx + b'x*ax)(cx)-c'x*px*qx)/cx^2
As written this looks like a' * x * b * x etc. To be clearer, write a'(x) * b(x) etc.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Sorry for the unclear notation. I was trying to make it clearer so there wouldn't be endless brackets but I guess it's even more confusing that way. Thank you for your help!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top