Solving Exploding Question with Relativity

  • Thread starter Thread starter asdf1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem involving the explosion of a stationary body into two fragments, each with a mass of 1.0 kg moving at 0.6c. Participants emphasize the importance of the law of conservation of momentum while considering the implications of relativity. There is clarification that "mass" typically refers to invariant mass unless specified otherwise, which simplifies the original mass calculation to 2.0 kg if taken as rest mass. The conversation also critiques the concept of relativistic mass, suggesting it can be misleading in the context of special relativity. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of applying relativistic principles to mass in explosive scenarios.
asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
In this question, "A stationary body explodes into two fragments each of mass 1.0 kg that move apart at speeds of 0.6c relative to the original body. Find the mass of the original body."

My first thought is that you need to use the law of conservation of momentum.

However, how do you take relativity into account since the pieces move near the speed of light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That question may be misleading. If, by "mass 1.0 kg" it refers to rest mass, aka invariant mass, then the original mass was simply 2.0 kg. If it meant relativistic mass, then you need to derive the rest mass from that (i.e. m(root(1-v^2/c^2))).
 
@@a
jeepers! i didn't think of that...
getting more and more complexed~
 
Generally, 'mass' is taken to mean invariant mass (i.e. the mass at rest). If someone wanted to specify relativistic mass, they would say 'relativistic mass' or 'relative mass'. I think the whole idea of relativistic mass of an already massive object in SR is somewhat misleading and pointless. It is much more relevant to the relative mass of energy, such as binding energy, that does not have a rest mass.
 
wow~
thanks! :)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top