Solving for a Vector - Resultant Known

  • Thread starter Thread starter math4life
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resultant Vector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a vector problem involving an airliner flying with a known airspeed and resultant ground speed. The key challenge is determining the wind's direction and speed using vector analysis. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly setting up the x and y components of the vectors and suggest isolating the wind vector for easier calculation. The angle of the wind vector can be found using the inverse tangent function, and the magnitude can be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem. Overall, the conversation aims to clarify the steps needed to solve the problem effectively.
math4life
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An airliner is flying in the direction North 20 degrees East with an airspeed of 300mph. Its ground speed and true course are 350mph and 30 degrees respectively(RESULTANT). Use a vector analysis to determine the direction and speed of the wind. Include a diagram.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


350mph/30 is the resultant/true course

I setup x components and y components to add below:
x:
300cos(70)+wind[cos(theta)]
y:
and 300sin(70)+wind[sin(theta)]

I don't know how to substitute properly to solve for the two variables theta and wind - which is the mph speed of the wind which is the second vector and not the resultant. Please help this is due tomorrow morning.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your angle for the panes airspeed and direction. Also what is each component equal to?
 
I have no idea what I did wrong- please let me know. I don't know what each angle is equal to either.
 
The angles are fine I was having a mad moment. The sum of the components of the wind and the aeroplane will be equal to the component of the resultant vector which you have been given.

Does this help you any more?
 
I reply to Math4life post as a test of my own understanding. I am not a teacher nor am I experienced at explaining or solving maths problems. Below is my response anyway.

The wording of the maths problem was

An airliner is flying in the direction North 20 degrees East with an airspeed of 300mph. Its ground speed and true course are 350mph and 30 degrees respectively(RESULTANT). Use a vector analysis to determine the direction and speed of the wind. Include a diagram.


First, there is a need to change some terms used.

Instead of the term "airspeed " ......I will use the term air velocity.
Instead of the term "ground speed and true course" I will use the term ground velocity.
Instead of the term "wind speed and direction" ...I will use the term wind velocity.


Math4life stated his problem as:

350mph/30 is the resultant/true course

I setup x components and y components to add below:
x:
300cos(70)+wind[cos(theta)]
y:
and 300sin(70)+wind[sin(theta)]

I don't know how to substitute properly to solve for the two variables theta and wind - which is the mph speed of the wind which is the second vector and not the resultant. Please help this is due tomorrow morning.


I made an attempt at getting a solution to this maths problem and it seems Math4life got stuck on formula transposition
(sorry, the proper name for the process escapes me at this point.)

Basically Math4life wrote Rx=Vx+Wx and Ry=Vy+Wy.
(R=ground velocity, V=planes air velocity, W=Wind Velocity, x = x-axis component of)

The unknown vector value W should be on its own. So, subtracting the
x-component or y-component of V from both sides of the equals sign
would be more useful. Math4life would be better off writing
Rx - Vx = Wx and Ry - Vy= Wy.


The angle of the wind velocity can be evaluated as
the reverse tan of (y-component / x-component).
Math4life would have given this angle the label 'theta'.
This gives tha angle of the wind vector from the the x-axis.
The format of the angle will need to be change to N/S degrees E/W form.


The x- and y- components can be put together and the vector magnitude
can be evaluated by W = \sqrt{(Wx^{2}+Wy^{2})}.

Please let me know of any errors and suggestions of better formating.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top