Solving for AC Voltmeters with a Pure Resistance and Pure Inductance

AI Thread Summary
In a series circuit with a pure resistance and pure inductance connected to a 100 V(rms) AC line, the AC voltmeter reads 70.7 V across both components due to equal voltage drop. When the inductance is adjusted so that the voltmeter reads 50 V across the inductor, the voltmeter across the resistor will read 86.7 V. The relationship between voltage, resistance, and inductance is governed by the impedance of the circuit. The calculations rely on the principles of voltage division and phasor analysis. Understanding the voltage triangle can further clarify the relationship between real and reactive voltages in the circuit.
bendaddy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a) A pure resistance and a pure inductance are connected in series across a 100 V(rms) AC line. An AC voltmeter gives the same reading when connected across either the R or the L. What does it read? (Note: Meters read rms values.)

b) The magnitudes of R and L are altered so that a voltmeter across L reads 50 V. What will the voltmeter read across R?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Solution should be: a) 70.7V ; b) 86.7V
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The voltage across the line depends on a number of things:
1) the position of the input waveform in terms of phase
2) the total impedance of the line

The total impedance of the line is the sum of the resistance and the inductance.

You know that the average voltage on the line should be 100V under no load conditions.

The voltage dropped across the resistor is a constant. It depends on the resistance of the resistor, as the current through the circuit is a fixed RMS current (same current flows through resistor, inductor and to/from source).

the voltage dropped across the inductor depends on the rate of change of the current passing through it:
v(t) = L (di/dt)

So... we can say that the rate of change is pretty constant... as the frequency is constant... and because the question tells you that the two voltages are the same you can relate the inductance of the inductor and the resistance of the resistor.

V1 = IR V2 = L(Di/dt)

For the two things to have the same voltage... in terms of voltage divider theory.. they must have the same overall impedance...

so IR = L(di/dt)

You need to have values of R and L which provide the same numbers for all values of I.

Lets consider I as a function of time I = sin(2*Pi*f*t)R*cos(2*Pi*f*t) = L d(sin(2*Pi*f*t))/dt

we know that d/dx (sin (t) ) = cos(t)

So...

R*cos(2*Pi*f*t) = L*(2*Pi*f) cos(2*Pi*f*t))

now we can divide...

R = L (2*Pi*f)

I guess f must be 1/2*Pi

for R = L

Not sure how to calculate an exact R or L without knowing the frequency...
but if you knew the frequency and the R and the L you can find the voltages across them (which we know to be the same) without a problem.

Hope this helps.
Are you sure there are not more variables or given/known data??

Good Luck :)
 
bendaddy said:

Homework Statement



a) A pure resistance and a pure inductance are connected in series across a 100 V(rms) AC line. An AC voltmeter gives the same reading when connected across either the R or the L. What does it read? (Note: Meters read rms values.)

b) The magnitudes of R and L are altered so that a voltmeter across L reads 50 V. What will the voltmeter read across R?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Solution should be: a) 70.7V ; b) 86.7V

You should provide an attempt at a solution, if only your own thoughts about how to approach the problem.

As a suggestion, investigate the voltage triangle for the circuit (similar to a power triangle, but places the real and reactive voltages on the "legs" of the triangle, with the hypotenuse representing the applied, or "apparent" voltage). This is analogous to a phasor analysis of the circuit.

attachment.php?attachmentid=57292&stc=1&d=1364704628.gif
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    819 bytes · Views: 623
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top