Solving for EMF: Potential Differences with R1 = 4 x R2 | Homework Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter yamugushi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Emf
AI Thread Summary
To solve for the potential difference in terms of EMF (E) with R1 = 4 x R2, the relationship between the resistances must be established. The initial values of R1 and R2 were simplified to 3/4 and 1/4, but further calculations revealed inconsistencies. By substituting R1 into the equations, the current can be expressed as a function of E and R2. Using Ohm's law (V = IR), the EMF across R2 can then be derived solely in terms of E after algebraic simplification. This approach allows for a clearer understanding of the potential differences in the circuit.
yamugushi
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If R1 = 4 x R2 then what are the values of the potential difference in terms of the EMF, E?
s.png

I have R1 = 3/4, and R2 = 1/4 but that seems a bit simplistic, then I tried plugging it into equations and got completely different answers.

Homework Equations


R=V/I (?)
EMF=v1 +v2


The Attempt at a Solution


First I simply put it as 1/4 and 3/4, then I plugged it into the equations:
v=IR
v1=1(4) =4
v2=1(1) =1
EMF=v1 + v2 = 5
R2 = 1.25, R1 = 5

??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solve the current, I. Express this interim result as a function of E, R1 and R2.

Since you know that R1 = 4 x R2, you can now express the current solely as function of E and R2 (since R1 goes away after the substitution).

Now that you know the current, using V = IR, find the EMF (i.e. voltage) across R2. You should be able to express it solely as a function of E (after some algebraic simplification).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top