Solving for Max Height & Side Lengths of Triangle Inclined at 24 Degrees

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves determining the maximum height of a rectangle and the maximum side lengths of an isosceles triangle on a 24-degree incline. The height of the rectangle is calculated using the formula 1.32tan66, resulting in approximately 2.964 meters. For the triangle, the base is halved to 0.66 meters, leading to a height of about 1.4823 meters from the centroid, which is then used to find the altitude as 4.449 meters. The final side length of the triangle is derived using the Pythagorean theorem, yielding approximately 4.4958 meters. The calculations should be double-checked for accuracy to avoid round-off errors.
tachu101
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given a isosceles triangle with base 1.32 meters and other sides unknown; Given rectangle with base 1.32 meters. These polygons are on an incline of 24 degrees. What are the maximum height of the rectangle and the maximum side lengths of the triangle (not the base) without have the objects tip over.

Homework Equations


The incline angle and the center of mass at 90 degrees is what the question is asking for. So the incline (24 degrees) + (unknown angle) = 90 so right away I know that the angle must be 66 degrees. Then I think that some trig comes into play.


The Attempt at a Solution


If you take half of the rectangle (to make a triangle) you can find the height of the rectangle by doing 1.32tan66=height which would get 2.964 meters. (is this the maximum height)?

The triangle is more complicated. I did the same thing and broke the triangle in half so 1.32 becomes .66 for the base. This then goes into .66tan66= height from base to the center of mass (centroid) which comes out to 1.4823 meters .
Then I think that the length of the base to the centroid and the length from the centroid to the top of the triangle is in the relationship of 1:2. So I tripled the 1.483 to get 4.449 meters as the length of the altitude.
Finally I use the Pythag Therm to get 4.449^2+.66^2= 4.4958 meters (and I think this is the answer)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method looks good. (You may want to recheck your arithmetic, looking for round-off errors.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top