Solving for Net Charge on Inner Surface of Conducting Shell

AI Thread Summary
The net charge on the inner surface of a conducting shell surrounding a charged sphere is -Q, induced by the +Q charge of the sphere. When a charge is placed outside the shell, the inner surface charge becomes -2Q to maintain neutrality, countering the external field. The use of the equation E=F/q is questioned for solving these problems, but the focus remains on charge distribution. If the sphere and shell are not concentric, the net charge on the inner surface remains the same, although the external charge's influence is clarified. The discussion emphasizes understanding charge interactions and the implications of external charges on the system's neutrality.
dipolarBear
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(1)A conducting sphere w/ charge +Q is surrounded by a spherical conducting shell.
What is net charge on inner surface of the shell?

(2) A charge is placed outside the shell.
What is the net charge on the inner surface now?

(3) What if the shell and sphere are not concentric, will this change your answers?


Homework Equations



E=\frac{F}{q}


The Attempt at a Solution



I've done some reading from 2 different books on the same topic, and I've gotten some info from other similar problems on PF. I still feel like I need work on this section, any help is appreciated. Thanks.

(1) The inner sphere will induce a -Q charge on the interior surface of the shell, and a +Q on the outer surface.

(2) This one has me stumped: I figure that the interior surface of the shell must become -2Q with the introduction of a point charge outside. I think since its a conducting shell, the charge inside must be zero, and as a result it must create an e-field that can counter the fields of both charges, in order to remain neutral. Could I use the equation E=\frac{F}{q}, to help me solve this problem?

(3) If the sphere and shell are not concentric, the results should be the same since we're dealing with the net charge on the interior surface.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In (2), you seem to assume that the external charge is equal the internal. That is not how the problem is stated.
 
Sorry, the problem uses q for the point charge outside, and +Q for the charge of the sphere. I'm not exactly sure if they're suppose to be the same, but if we assumed they were not equivalent, would the charge of the interior surface in (2) be -(Q+q)? Thanks
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top