Solving for Vemf and Internal Resistance

AI Thread Summary
To find the emf and internal resistance of a battery connected to different resistors, two currents are measured: 3.98 A with a 110-ohm resistor and 1.11 A with a 400-ohm resistor. The voltages calculated from these currents are 438.7 V and 444 V, respectively, indicating the influence of the battery's internal resistance. The internal resistance affects both measurements, and it is important to treat the resistors as separate circuits rather than in series or parallel. Understanding the concept of internal resistance is crucial for solving the problem accurately. The discussion emphasizes the need to check calculations and apply textbook knowledge for clarity.
pleasehelpme6
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
When a battery is connected to a 110.-ohm resistor, the current is 3.98 A. When the same battery is connected to a 400.-ohm resistor, the current is 1.11 A.

Find the emf supplied by the battery and the internal resistance of the battery.





Equations:

Vemf = i*R

I'm not sure how to approach this since you get two voltages (438.7 and 444) from the different resistors.

Should I treat these resistors like they are in the same circuit? In series or in parallel?

Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pleasehelpme6 said:
I'm not sure how to approach this since you get two voltages (438.7 and 444) from the different resistors.
Yes, you'll get two different voltages, by using different resistors, because there is another resistance involved that is always there: the internal resistance of the battery.

(By the way, check your math regarding the voltages you calculated.)
Should I treat these resistors like they are in the same circuit?
Not the 110 and 400 Ω resistors, no.

But the battery's internal resistance is always there, so yes, the internal resistance is within the circuit in both cases.
In series or in parallel?
What do you think? (Hint: look in your textbook for "internal resistance" of a battery, and the answer should be clear.)
 
Thanks! that explanation makes a lot of sense. I'm sure I can figure the rest out from there!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top