Solving for voltage in a circuit.

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter CoolDude420
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Voltage
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving for the voltage across a resistor in a circuit and confirming power conservation. Participants explore concepts related to circuit analysis, including Kirchhoff's laws, current and voltage division, and the principle of superposition.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about starting the problem, particularly regarding the direction of current arrows and the concepts of voltage/current division.
  • Another participant suggests that components in parallel share the same potential difference, implying that the voltage across the resistor could be 1V.
  • There is a discussion about the need to address power conservation in addition to finding the voltage across the resistor.
  • One participant calculates the power consumed by the resistor as P(resistor) = 1V * 1A but expresses uncertainty about the direction of currents from the current and voltage sources.
  • A later reply clarifies that current arrows indicate interpretation rather than actual flow direction, and discusses the implications for the currents i2 and i3 based on Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL).
  • It is proposed that i2 could be -1A, suggesting a change in interpretation of the current direction, and that i3 is calculated as 1A based on the known potential difference across the resistor.
  • Participants explore the relationship between the currents at the top node and conclude that i1 equals 0A, indicating it neither consumes nor dissipates power.
  • Power calculations for both the current source and the resistor are discussed, leading to the assertion that energy is conserved in the circuit.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and confidence regarding the circuit analysis. While some agree on the voltage across the resistor being 1V, the discussion about power conservation and current directions remains nuanced and unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention concepts such as current division, voltage division, and the principle of superposition, but there is no consensus on how these apply to the specific circuit in question. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the interpretation of current directions and the implications for power calculations.

CoolDude420
Messages
199
Reaction score
9

Homework Statement


3171d73244.png


Find the voltage across the resistor and confirm that power in this circuit is conserved.

Homework Equations


KVL
KCL
V=IR, V=I^2R

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea where to start with this. We haven't learned voltage/current division yet. I am getting thrown by the i1 and i2 arrows pointing in weird directions. I don't know how to deal with this. Also we haven't done the principle of superposition nor the Thevenin stuff.

The chapter after the one this question was found in tells me about current divison and voltage division and in it it also mentions that anything in parallel with a voltage source can be ignored(as far as the circuit is concerned it isn't there), the same applies to anything in series with a current source. Knowing that, can't I just ignore the current source and just say that the voltage across the resistor 1V?

Super confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi CoolDude420, Welcome to Physics Forums.

CoolDude420 said:
I have no idea where to start with this. We haven't learned voltage/current division yet. I am getting thrown by the i1 and i2 arrows pointing in weird directions. I don't know how to deal with this. Also we haven't done the principle of superposition nor the Thevenin stuff.

The chapter after the one this question was found in tells me about current divison and voltage division and in it it also mentions that anything in parallel with a voltage source can be ignored(as far as the circuit is concerned it isn't there), the same applies to anything in series with a current source. Knowing that, can't I just ignore the current source and just say that the voltage across the resistor 1V?

Yes, the principle involved is one of the most basic and also one of the first things introduced in a course on electronics: Components in parallel share the same potential difference.
 
gneill said:
Hi CoolDude420, Welcome to Physics Forums.
Yes, the principle involved is one of the most basic and also one of the first things introduced in a course on electronics: Components in parallel share the same potential difference.
So the answer is 1V?
 
CoolDude420 said:
So the answer is 1V?
Well, part of the answer is 1 V :smile: You still need to deal with the power conservation part of the question.
 
gneill said:
Well, part of the answer is 1 V :smile: You still need to deal with the power conservation part of the question.

Oh yes. P=VI, the Power consumed by the resistor is then P(resistor) = 1V*1A. Um. these arrows are throwing me off. I don't understand where the current from the current source is going. Also I am assuming there's also another current from the voltage source too? Can you clarify where the currents are going?
 
Don't take the current arrows as specifying the actual directions of the currents. They're simply specifying how you are to interpret their directions. It may turn out that one or more of them will have negative values because they are actually drawn in the opposite direction to the actual current flow.

One current that you can be absolutely sure of its direction is that of the current source. It will cause its specified current to flow in the direction of its symbol's arrow no matter what. So what does that tell you about i2?

You know the potential difference across the resistor, so what is i3?

Apply KCL at the top node.
 
gneill said:
Don't take the current arrows as specifying the actual directions of the currents. They're simply specifying how you are to interpret their directions. It may turn out that one or more of them will have negative values because they are actually drawn in the opposite direction to the actual current flow.

One current that you can be absolutely sure of its direction is that of the current source. It will cause its specified current to flow in the direction of its symbol's arrow no matter what. So what does that tell you about i2?

You know the potential difference across the resistor, so what is i3?

Apply KCL at the top node.

It means i2 is -1A (or just change the arrow upward and i2 will be 1A).

i3 is V/R = 1/1 = 1A.

So i2(1A) is entering the top node and i3(1A) is leaving the top node and let's assume i1 is also leaving the top node. So current into top node = current out. So that means i2=i3+i1
So 1 = 1 +i1
So i1 = 0A, meaning it consumes nor dissipates any power.

And so Power for the current source is P=VI = (1)(-1) =1W and for the resistor its consuming 1W so, overall is 0, meaning energy is conserved.
 
Sounds good!
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K