MHB Solving for $z_1^*$: Argand Diagram

  • Thread starter Thread starter fordy2707
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Argand Diagram
fordy2707
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
hi all,hope I find you all well and that I've posted this in the correct section

ive been given this $z_1$ =1-j2

Question ,find and show the result of $z_1 ^*$ on an argand diagram ,my question is what does the star symbol represent or is it a typo?

many thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
fordy2707 said:
hi all,hope I find you all well and that I've posted this in the correct section

ive been given this $z_1$ =1-j2

Question ,find and show the result of $z_1 ^*$ on an argand diagram ,my question is what does the star symbol represent or is it a typo?

many thanks

If $j$ is meant to represent $\sqrt{-1}$, then the star most likely represents complex-conjugation, so that if:

$z = a + jb$ (with $a,b \in \Bbb R$)

then $z^{\ast} = a - jb$ (we replace the imaginary part with its negative).
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    53.9 KB · Views: 127
I don't think it's a typo-see my earlier post.
 
Yep I'm with you, thanks.i looked up the wording you used and found this to certainly be the case many thanks for the help.it amazes me that I have this thrown into my questions without any prior explanation of its meaning.
 
The "overline", [math]\overline{z}[/math] is more common but, yes, the asterisk is sometimes used to indicate the complex conjugate. If [math]z= x+ iy[/math], then [math]z^*= \overline{z}= x- iy[/math].
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top