Solving Forces and Angles to Load Fuel Drum

  • Thread starter Thread starter k3l
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles Forces
AI Thread Summary
The operator can use the plank to load the 200L fuel drum because tilting the plank reduces the gravitational force acting perpendicular to its surface, allowing it to support more weight without breaking. The critical weight that caused the original plank to break was 166 kg when loaded horizontally, but at an angle, the effective weight is decreased. To find the minimum angle at which the plank can still safely load the drum, the equation (197 kg) * cos(A) = 166 kg can be used. This calculation shows that as the angle increases, the load capacity of the plank also increases. Therefore, the plank can be utilized effectively as a ramp for the fuel drum.
k3l
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
hi, i need help on a question

its like... there is a operator supported a plank horizontally by its two ends, but when loaded bricks on its centre and found that the weight of 166kg of bricks was just enough to break the plank. But an identical plank is now being used as a ramp to load a full 200L fuel drum onto a truck. The drum and its contents have a mass of 197kg.

a) Carefully explain why the operator could still use this plank to load the fuel drum.
b) what is the minimum angle to the horizontal at which the plank can still used to load the drum?

i don't know where to start... as i don't know how to answer part a) :mad:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
min angle would be = cos-1(166/197)
 
and the reason the greater weight could be carried is b/c when the plank is at angle the internal moment arm is less
 
k3l said:
hi, i need help on a question

its like... there is a operator supported a plank horizontally by its two ends, but when loaded bricks on its centre and found that the weight of 166kg of bricks was just enough to break the plank. But an identical plank is now being used as a ramp to load a full 200L fuel drum onto a truck. The drum and its contents have a mass of 197kg.

a) Carefully explain why the operator could still use this plank to load the fuel drum.
b) what is the minimum angle to the horizontal at which the plank can still used to load the drum?

i don't know where to start... as i don't know how to answer part a) :mad:

The original plank broke at 166 kg because the gravitational force NORMAL to its surface exceeded the plank's capacity. When the plank is tilted, the component of gravitational force NORMAL to the surface is reduced by a factor of cos(A), where "A" is the plank's tilt angle with respect to horizontal ground. Thus, the minimum "A" required for 197 kg can be determined from:
(197)*cos(A) = (166) <--- (derive this yourself by resolving grav force into components normal and parallel to plank surface)
~
 
Last edited:
how do i attach a document
 
plank

this should help
 

Attachments

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'

Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'

TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
View full post »
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'

Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'

My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
View full post »

Similar threads

Problem with my Venturi operated Drum Vac
Replies
11
Views
3K
Calculating minimum torque and energy in a crane system?
Replies
12
Views
5K
Torque biomechanics
Replies
6
Views
2K
Statically Indeterminate Truck - Finding reaction forces at supports
Replies
8
Views
2K
Calculate tilt angle of a bar lifted via two ropes on fixed points
Replies
7
Views
3K
Can someone help me to design a boat inclined lift ?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Calculating the Minimum Force for Box to Move at Constant Velocity
Replies
2
Views
2K
How do I calculate the required torque for a drum with a wire rope load?
Replies
5
Views
7K
Find the tension in the cable and the force the ramp exerts on the tires
Replies
8
Views
5K
Need to know how to solve for test
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top