Solving Frames of Reference Homework: Static/Kinetic Friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics homework problem involving a block on a rotating merry-go-round. Participants clarify the forces acting on the block, including weight, normal force, centripetal force, and friction. For the block to remain at rest relative to the platform, the centripetal force must be equal to or less than the static friction force. The correct approach involves calculating centripetal acceleration using the platform's velocity and distance from the pivot. Ultimately, the block is expected to remain at rest since the centripetal force does not exceed the static friction force.
JWSiow
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A child sits 2m from the centre of a merry-go-round (a rotating wooden platform) which is rotating at 3.5revs/min in a clockwise direction (when viewed from above). She places a wooden block of mass m=0.25kg beside her on the platform.

a)Draw a diagram showing all the forces acting on the block, and describe each force.

b)If the block remains at rest relative to the platform, calculate its acceleration. Explain your reasoning.

c)If the coefficients of static and kinetic friction between the block and the platform are 0.2 and 0.18 respectively, do you expect the block to remain at rest or to slide relative to the platform?


Homework Equations


F(friction) = \mukFN
F(friction) = \musFN


The Attempt at a Solution


a)I'm not sure if I had the write forces in my diagram, I had the weigh mg, normal force, centripetal force and friction force.

b)I'm not sure about this one either, but I think, since the frame of reference is the platform, and the block is not moving, acceleration = 0. ?

c)I didn't really know what to do for this, so I worked out the static and kinetic friction forces, and then compared it to the centripetal force. Since the centripetal force was smaller than the static friction force, the block would remain at rest. I don't know if this is correct, or if it's even a good explanation!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JWSiow said:
a)I'm not sure if I had the write forces in my diagram, I had the weigh mg, normal force, centripetal force and friction force.

b)I'm not sure about this one either, but I think, since the frame of reference is the platform, and the block is not moving, acceleration = 0. ?

c)I didn't really know what to do for this, so I worked out the static and kinetic friction forces, and then compared it to the centripetal force. Since the centripetal force was smaller than the static friction force, the block would remain at rest. I don't know if this is correct, or if it's even a good explanation!
(a) friction force is the centripetal force.,so you have three forces ("centripetal force" is just the name of real force directed to the center. In this case - friction force)

(b) No. Platform is not inertial frame of reference. So in this frame of reference there is centrifugal force. You have two possibilities: use ground frame of refference and calculate centripetal acceleration (recommended :smile:) OR use platform as a frame of refference and calculate centrifugal acceleration.

(c) OK, but block would remain rest since centripetal force was smaller OR EQUAL to static friction force

regards
 
Ok, thanks. :)

So, for b), when calculating the centripetal acceleration, I'd use the velocity of the platform?
 
JWSiow said:
So, for b), when calculating the centripetal acceleration, I'd use the velocity of the platform?
Yes. And distance between mass and pivot. Find centripetal force first.

regards
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top