Solving Frictionless Freight Car's Initial Speed

laurensummer
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 5000-kg freight car rolls along rails with negligible friction. The car is brought to rest by a combination of two coiled springs as illustrated in the figure below. Both springs are described by Hooke's law and have spring constants with k1 = 1500 N/m and k2 = 3700 N/m. After the first spring compresses a distance of 32.1 cm, the second spring acts with the first to increase the force as additional compression occurs as shown in the graph. The car comes to rest 48.0 cm after first contacting the two-spring system. Find the car's initial speed


Homework Equations



What I did is coming up wrong, but I tried using F = -Kx for both springs and got for F(1) = 1500 * .48 = 720 and for f(2) got 588.8 making the total work 1308.3. I plugged this value into W = 1/2 MV^2 with v = 0.501 in the end. This is not right. I would be so grateful to anyone who could direct me on this one I have been working on it for 2 hours! Its making me crazy!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


To compute work done by a force F(x) that varies with distance, you must compute
\int_{d_0}^{d_1} F(x) dx
For hooke's law springs, that would be \int_{d_0}^{d_1} kx \ dx

Are these springs side-by-side or end-to-end with each other?
 


laurensummer said:

Homework Statement



A 5000-kg freight car rolls along rails with negligible friction. The car is brought to rest by a combination of two coiled springs as illustrated in the figure below. Both springs are described by Hooke's law and have spring constants with k1 = 1500 N/m and k2 = 3700 N/m. After the first spring compresses a distance of 32.1 cm, the second spring acts with the first to increase the force as additional compression occurs as shown in the graph. The car comes to rest 48.0 cm after first contacting the two-spring system. Find the car's initial speed


Homework Equations



What I did is coming up wrong, but I tried using F = -Kx for both springs and got for F(1) = 1500 * .48 = 720 and for f(2) got 588.8 making the total work 1308.3.
What? the total force is 1308.3, not work!
Strictly speaking, what you should do is integrate the force function over the stopping distance but because the force function is linear, you can just multiply the average force by the stopping distance.

I plugged this value into W = 1/2 MV^2 with v = 0.501 in the end. This is not right. I would be so grateful to anyone who could direct me on this one I have been working on it for 2 hours! Its making me crazy!
 


Stephen, there is a thinner/longer spring (k1) inside of a wider/shorter spring (k2) attached to a wall on the right.
I am going to try what you both have suggested to do and get back, thanks a million.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top