Solving Galilean Transform Homework with Gradients in (u,v)

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkovMarakov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galilean Transform
MarkovMarakov
Messages
32
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


If there is a change of variables:
(\vec x(t),t)\to (\vec u=\vec x+\vec a(t),\,\,\,v=t+b) where b is a constant.

Suppose I wish to write the following expression in terms of a gradient in (\vec u, v)

\nabla_\vec x f(\vec x,t)+{d^2\vec a\over dt^2} How do I do that?

Homework Equations


Please see above.

The Attempt at a Solution


For the first term, I think
f(\vec x, t)\to f(\vec u -\vec a, v-b)
I am not sure what to do with the second term though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should use chain rule I think, so

\frac{\partial }{\partial x}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\frac{\partial}{\partial u}

If I understood your question, this is what you are looking for.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top