Can I Solve Complex Numbers in Polar Form Like Regular Equations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a complex number equation in polar form, specifically the equation 5<0° = -14.14<-45° + 2.24<116.6° I2. The user attempts to isolate I2 by manipulating the equation but faces confusion regarding the correct method for adding polar terms. Responses emphasize the need to convert polar forms to rectangular coordinates to accurately perform the addition and solve for I2. The importance of understanding the underlying calculations, rather than solely relying on a calculator, is highlighted for better comprehension of complex number operations. Ultimately, the user seeks confirmation on whether their approach to solving polar equations mirrors traditional algebraic methods.
noname1
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
I got this equation

5<0° = -14.14<-45° + 2.24<116.6° I2

And i solved I2 this way

I2 = -14.14<-45° / 2.24<116.6°

I2 = 8<150.29°

I want to know complex numbers is the same way as normal math or not

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
noname1 said:
I got this equation

5<0° = -14.14<-45° + 2.24<116.6° I2

And i solved I2 this way

I2 = -14.14<-45° / 2.24<116.6°

I2 = 8<150.29°

I want to know complex numbers is the same way as normal math or not

thanks in advance

What is I2? Is it something special, or just a term multiplying the 2nd number on the righthand side (RHS) of the equation?

If the latter, I think it would be more traditional to write it as:

5<0° = -14.14<-45° + I2 * 2.24<116.6°
 
i2 is being multiplied, its a current in the second mesh but i just wanted to be sure if it is that way its calculated
 
noname1 said:
i2 is being multiplied, its a current in the second mesh but i just wanted to be sure if it is that way its calculated

In that case, I don't think you've solved for I2 correctly. For one thing, the LHS term disappeared?

To add the two terms on the RHS, you would convert from polar to rectangular form, and add the x and y components. Then represent the LHS in rectangular components (that part is easy), and solve for I2.
 
berkeman said:
In that case, I don't think you've solved for I2 correctly. For one thing, the LHS term disappeared?

To add the two terms on the RHS, you would convert from polar to rectangular form, and add the x and y components. Then represent the LHS in rectangular components (that part is easy), and solve for I2.


what do you mean by lhs and rhs? i am kind of lost
 
noname1 said:
what do you mean by lhs and rhs? i am kind of lost

I defined the term RHS in my post #2.
 
berkeman said:
I defined the term RHS in my post #2.

this is what i did, i put i2 term on left side and than the rest on the rhs and since i want I2 i divided both equations by 2.24<116.6°

5<0° = -14.14<-45° + I2 * 2.24<116.6°

5<0° + 14.14<-45° = I2 * 2.24<116.6°

(5<0° + 14.14<-45°) / 2.24<116.6° = I2

I2 = 8<150.29°
 
noname1 said:
this is what i did, i put i2 term on left side and than the rest on the rhs and since i want I2 i divided both equations by 2.24<116.6°

5<0° = -14.14<-45° + I2 * 2.24<116.6°

5<0° + 14.14<-45° = I2 * 2.24<116.6°

(5<0° + 14.14<-45°) / 2.24<116.6° = I2

I2 = 8<150.29°

How are you adding terms in polar form?
 
  • #10
berkeman said:
How are you adding terms in polar form?

this part

(5<0° + 14.14<-45°) / 2.24<116.6° = I2

i have my ti-89 calculating it but i just want to know if it is correct if i can calculate polar form like a normal equation

example

3x -5 = 10
3x = 15
x=5
 
  • #11
noname1 said:
this part

(5<0° + 14.14<-45°) / 2.24<116.6° = I2

i have my ti-89 calculating it but i just want to know if it is correct if i can calculate polar form like a normal equation

example

3x -5 = 10
3x = 15
x=5

LOL. Your calculator is doing the conversions for you (hopefully). You might want to double check the answer the good old fashioned way, by hand, just to be sure you understand the process.
 
Back
Top