Solving Integral: \int \frac {x+4}{x^2+2x+5}

  • Thread starter Thread starter laker88116
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
AI Thread Summary
To solve the integral ∫ (x+4)/(x²+2x+5) dx, it is effective to split the fraction into two parts: one that can be integrated as the natural logarithm and another that leads to an arctangent function. First, the derivative of the denominator, 2x + 2, is used to adjust the numerator. This allows the integral to be expressed as a combination of simpler integrals, one of which is straightforwardly integrated to yield the logarithm of the denominator. The remaining part can be simplified using the method of completing the square, leading to an arctangent result. Understanding these techniques is crucial for tackling integrals of this form effectively.
laker88116
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
\int \frac {x+4}{x^2+2x+5}

I have no idea where to start on this. I can't see any substitutions that would work. I tried completing the square. I also tried to split up the fraction. It isn't getting any simpler. Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Integrals of this type can always be split into an "ln-part" and an "arctan-part".

First, calculate the derivative of the denominator and adjust your nominator to get this and split the rest.

\left( {x^2 + 2x + 5} \right)^\prime = 2x + 2

The integral then becomes

\int {\frac{{x + 4}}{{x^2 + 2x + 5}}} dx = \frac{1}{2}\int {\frac{{2x + 2 + 6}}{{x^2 + 2x + 5}}} dx = \frac{1}{2}\int {\frac{{2x + 2}}{{x^2 + 2x + 5}}} dx + 3\int {\frac{{dx}}{{x^2 + 2x + 5}}}

Now the first integral simply becomes the ln of the denominator, because that's how we 'made' it, it's now of the form f'(x)/f(x).
The second one no longer has an x in the nominator and you can complete a square in the denominator to get an arctan.
 
I understand that and it makes sense. I just don't get how you determine that's what you do.
 
Well, this is a standard way for these integrals.
When the degree of the nominator isn't lower that the one of the denominator, you can divide first (euclidean division on the polynomials) to get this case again.
 
Alright, I think I got this better now. Thanks.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top