Solving Kolb & Turner's Reheating Problem with 1st Law of Thermodynamics

  • Thread starter Thread starter pleasehelpmeno
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmology
pleasehelpmeno
Messages
154
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


i i am trying to derive \dot{\rho_{R}}+4H\rho_{R}-\Gamma_{\phi}\rho_{\phi}=0 as in Kolb an turner (Boltzmann describing reheating).

Is the correct approach to, use the 1st law dU=dQ-pdV, but what would dQ be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is just the equation of conservation of energy, with an extra term with transfers energy from the inflaton to radiation.
 
how though can it be derived?
I no that: dU=(a^{3}\rho_{R}) and 1/3\rho dV= pdV, but I am not sure about dQ.

It is obviously then \rho_R d(a^3)+a^{3}d\rho_{R}=dQ - 1/3\rho_{R}d(a^3) Then by dividing through by dt one can get \dot{\rho}_{R}+4H\rho_{R} -\frac{dQ}{dt} =0.

I don't see how one can justify \Gamma_{\phi}\rho_{\phi}=\frac{dQ}{dt}
 
I don't see how you can justify using the first law in that form, when clearly in reheating the number of particles is not conserved. It's my understanding that the \Gamma \rho-term is just phenomenological.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top