Solving Ladder Operator Problem w/ 4 Terms

Sheepattack
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have been given the following problem -
the expectation value of px4 in the ground state of a harmonic oscillator can be expressed as
<px4> = h4/4a4 {integral(-infin to +infin w0*(x) (AAA+A+ + AA+AA+ + A+AAA+) w0 dx}

I think I know how to proceed on other examples, but my given examples only have ladder operators with two terms, i.e. AA+ or A+A.
I can then use the commutation relation, AA+ - A+A =1 to remove them.

what has stuck me here is the four ladder operators in a term. I'm totally unsure on how to proceed!

any advice would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know what A and A+ do to eigenstates? A+ψn = sqrt(n+1)ψn+1 and Aψn=sqrt(n)*ψn-1, so you can just keep applying the appropriate operator until you get down to a constant multiple of the eigenfunction.
 
I'd like to suggest a completely different method. Use two things here

1. Schrodinger's equation, which can be rearranged to form
p^2\psi = c (E-V)\psi where c is some constant

2. The fact the p is hermitian

<br /> \left&lt;p^4\right&gt; = \left&lt;\psi |p^4|\psi\right&gt; = \left&lt;p^2\psi|p^2\psi\right&gt; = c^2 \left&lt;(E-V)^2\right&gt;<br />

The last part of the above integral can be greatly simplified using the evenness or oddness of the functions \psi and V. Try it.
 
Many thanks for both your replies.

I think ideasrule's method was the one I am supposed to follow - managed to get the right answer! A few more clouds lifted...
thanks again
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top