Solving Mass Spring System with Horizontal Force Applied

Billybobbean
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello PF users! This is my first post here, I'm looking for a bit of help with my mechanics assignment.

1. The question is asking me to investigate a mass with a spring and dampner attaching it to a vertical wall, and then it having a horizontal force applied to it.
The mass is 0.1kg
The springs stiffness is 0.6N/m
and there is a dampner with a damping constant of 0.5 Ns/m
At time=0 the mass is in its stationary equilibirum position when it has a force of 0.1sin(t) N applied to it (away from the wall, i.e. the spring will stretch)


2. I am then asked to find the second order differential equation that governs the subsequent motion, which is what I'm stuck on. When I say stuck on I mean don't really know where to start.

3. Sorry, I got nothing :frown:

Any help/pointers/explanations you can give would be helpful, at the moment I am completely stumped.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Billybobbean said:
2. I am then asked to find the second order differential equation that governs the subsequent motion, which is what I'm stuck on. When I say stuck on I mean don't really know where to start.
Can you write out the equation of motion without the damping term? (hint: acceleration is the second derivative of position with respect to time). That is a second order differential equation. Then add the damping term.

AM
 
cant make the forum code work ill draw it when i get home.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top