Solving Partial Differential Equations with Laplace Transform

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the partial differential equation (PDE) given by \(\frac{\partial^2 \varphi}{\partial x^2} - \frac{\partial^2 \varphi}{\partial t^2} = 1\) using the Laplace Transform. The initial conditions are \(\varphi(x, 0) = 1\) and \(\varphi_t(x, 0) = 1\), while the boundary condition is \(\varphi(0, t) = 1\). The Laplace Transform leads to a characteristic equation for the eigenvalue \(r\), which is derived as \(r = \frac{s^3 \pm \sqrt{s^6 - 4s(s^2 + s - 1)}}{2s}\). The discussion highlights the need to verify the characteristic equation and the assumptions made in the solution process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with Laplace Transform techniques
  • Knowledge of initial and boundary value problems
  • Ability to solve characteristic equations in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the properties of the Laplace Transform in solving PDEs
  • Study the derivation and application of characteristic equations in differential equations
  • Explore methods for handling non-homogeneous PDEs
  • Learn about eigenvalue problems in the context of differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students focusing on applied mathematics, particularly those working with partial differential equations and Laplace Transforms.

mliuzzolino
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[itex] <br /> \dfrac{\partial^2 \varphi }{ \partial x^2} - \dfrac{\partial ^2 \varphi }{\partial t^2} = 1<br /> [/itex]

Initial Conditions:

[itex]\varphi (x, 0) = 1; \varphi_t (x, 0) = 1[/itex]

Boundary Condition:

[itex]\varphi (0, t) = 1[/itex]


On [itex]0 \leq x < \infty, 0 \leq t < \infty[/itex]


Homework Equations



Let [itex]{\Phi}[/itex] denote the Laplace transform from t to s.

The Attempt at a Solution



Apply Laplace Transform to PDE:

[itex] <br /> \dfrac{\partial^2 \Phi }{ \partial x^2} - s^2\Phi + s\varphi (x, 0) + \varphi _t (x, 0) = \dfrac{1}{s}<br /> [/itex]

Apply Initial Conditions:

[itex] <br /> \dfrac{\partial^2 \Phi }{ \partial x^2} - s^2\Phi + s + 1 - \dfrac{1}{s} = 0<br /> [/itex]




[itex] <br /> \dfrac{\partial^2 \Phi }{ \partial x^2} - s^2\Phi + \dfrac{s^2 + s - 1}{s} = 0<br /> [/itex]


This leads to the eigenvalue being something like:

[itex] <br /> r = \dfrac{s^3 \pm \sqrt{s^6 - 4s(s^2 + s - 1)}}{2s}<br /> [/itex]

which is always positive for both cases.

The solution in Laplace space should be something like:

[itex] <br /> \Phi (x, s) = A(s) e ^{\dfrac{s^3 + \sqrt{s^6 - 4s(s^2 + s - 1)}}{2s}x} + B(s) e ^{\dfrac{s^3 - \sqrt{s^6 - 4s(s^2 + s - 1)}}{2s}x}<br /> [/itex]

and since the eigenvalue is always positive, as x goes to infinity the exponential terms will explode, requiring both A(s) and B(s) to be equal to 0.

What am I doing wrong? Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would check your final calculation for the solution Φ in Laplace space. It seems to not depend on x, which is weird. If you're still working on this, that is.
 
mliuzzolino said:
[itex] <br /> \dfrac{\partial^2 \Phi }{ \partial x^2} - s^2\Phi + \dfrac{s^2 + s - 1}{s} = 0<br /> [/itex]This leads to the eigenvalue being something like:

[itex] <br /> r = \dfrac{s^3 \pm \sqrt{s^6 - 4s(s^2 + s - 1)}}{2s}<br /> [/itex]

which is always positive for both cases.

I would double-check this step. It looks like you assumed a solution ##\Phi(x,s) = e^{rx}##, and then tried to solve the characteristic equation ##r^2 - s^2 r + (s^2 + s -1)/s = 0##, but this equation for r is not correct. Your purely ordinary differential equation in x is not homogeneous - only two of your terms depend on ##\Phi##. If you plug in ##\Phi(x,s) = e^{rx}##, what happens when you try to divide out the ##e^{rx}## to get the characteristic equation for r?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K