Solving Poyntings Vector for a point charge

HPRF
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



It is found that Poyntings vector gives

P = ExH = (mu0q2a2sin2(theta)/6pi2cr2)r

This apparently leads to

Total Power = (mu0q2a2/6pi2c)\int(sin2(theta)/r2)(2pir2sin(theta)d\theta)

What I am unsure of is where the

(2pir2sin(theta)d\theta)

appears from. Can anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[strike]The power is over the whole of the volume, and not just one component of the volume.[/strike] When you are coming from Cartesian coordinates to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_coordinate_system#Cartesian_coordinates", we find

<br /> \int dV=\int_{-\infty}^\infty dx\int_{-\infty}^\infty dy\int_{-\infty}^\infty dz=\int_0^\infty r^2dr\int_0^\pi \sin\theta \,d\theta\int_0^{2\pi} d\phi<br />
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jdwood983 said:
The power is over the whole of the volume[/color], and not just one component of the volume.

Errr... not quite...Poynting's theorem tells us that the power crossing a surface \mathcal{S} is given by

P(\textbf{r})=\int_{\mathcal{S}}\textbf{S}\cdot d\textbf{a}

(using \textbf{S} to represent the Poynting vector and d\textbf{a} to represent the infinitesimal vector area element of the surface)

To find the power radiated, one usually uses a spherical surface of radius r (so that d\textbf{a}=r^2\sin\theta d\theta d\phi\mathbf{\hat{r}}[/tex])) and then takes the limit as r\to\infty (since radiation escapes to infinity).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top