Solving Question B3 from the 1999 Putnam Exam

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


At this link, in the solution to question B3,
http://www.unl.edu/amc/a-activities/a7-problems/putnam/-pdf/1999s.pdf
how did they get the second-to-last equality? Right above the words "and the desired limit is"?

I tried factoring every way I know how and it did not work out!

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It seemed straightforward to grind it out.

After finding a common denominator, xy is clearly a factor of the numerator. If you collect terms w.r.t. x, 1-y is clearly a factor of each coefficient. (And by symmetry, the same will be true when you collect terms w.r.t. y)



Alternatively, if you just attempted to naively compute the limit without bothering to factor, you'd see that

xy * [ 1 - x^2 + x^3 y^2 - y^2 + x^2 y^3 - x^3 y^3 ]

has a zero at x = 1. Therefore, x-1 must be a factor, and so you can divide it out of the numerator and denominator. Similarly for y-1.



Incidentally, you don't have to be quite so clever to solve this problem. If you simply rearrange the sum for S(x, y) into an ordinary double sum (maybe, split it into even n and odd n), it looks like you can just brute force compute the closed form for S(x, y) by repeatedly applying the geometric series formula.
 
Last edited:
Incidentally, what I said is surely what I would have done if I were actually taking the exam.

(1) Rewrite the problem in a familiar form.
S = \sum_{\frac{1}{2} \leq \frac{m}{n} \leq 2} x^m y^n<br /> =<br /> \sum_{n = 1}^{+\infty} \sum_{m = \lceil \frac{n}{2} \rceil}^{2n} x^m y^n<br />

(2) To eliminate the ceiling function, separate into even and odd n.

S_1 = \sum_{p = 1}^{+\infty} \sum_{m = p}^{4p-2} x^m y^{2p-1}

S_2 = \sum_{p = 1}^{+\infty} \sum_{m = p}^{4p} x^m y^{2p}

S = S_1 + S_2

(3) Compute the inner sum.

S_1 = \sum_{p = 1}^{+\infty} y^{2p-1}<br /> \frac{x^{4p - 1} - x^p}{x - 1}

(4) Separate the sums and compute again.

S_1 = \frac{1}{x-1} ( S_{1,1} - S_{1,2} )

S_{1,1} = \sum_{p=1}^{+\infty} y^{2p-1} x^{4p-1}<br /> = \frac{y x^3}{1 - y^2 x^4}

S_{1,2} = \sum_{p=1}^{+\infty} y^{2p-1} x^{p}

And so forth.



Once I get the closed form solution, unless I make a lucky observation, I would either

(A) Manage to factor the numerator.
(B) Plug in x=1 and thus notice that x-1 must be a factor.
(C) Realize that the limit can only exist if the x-1 in the denominator gets canceled out in the numerator.
 
Last edited:
Hurkyl said:
After finding a common denominator, xy is clearly a factor of the numerator. If you collect terms w.r.t. x, 1-y is clearly a factor of each coefficient. (And by symmetry, the same will be true when you collect terms w.r.t. y)

What do you mean collect terms with respect the variable x? Do you mean write it as a polynomial in x? I do not see how that is straightforward?
 
Last edited:
Example of collecting terms in x:

1 + y + x - x^2 - xy^2 - x^2 y = (1 + y) + (1 - y^2) x - (1 + y) x^2
 
OK. Thanks.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top