Solving Spinning Iron Wire Angular Velocity Change

monnomestalex
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Iron atoms (atomic mass 56) contain two free electron spins that can align with an external magnetic field. An iron wire 3 cm long and 1 mm in diameter is suspended vertically and is free to rotate about its axis. A strong magnetic field parallel to the wire's axis is applied. How large is the resulting change in its angular velocity.

Homework Equations



\oint \vec{E} \cdot \vec{dl} = - \frac{d}{dt} \int \vec{B} \cdot \vec{da}

Poynting vector: \vec{S} = \mu_0 \vec{E} \times \vec{B}.

Bohr's magneton might come in handy: \mu_b = \frac{e \hbar}{2 m_e}

The Attempt at a Solution



My first thought was to find the Poynting vector because the angular momentum contained in the fields is proportional to \vec{r} \times \vec{S}. Assuming the wire is in the z direction, we can write that the applied magnetic field is \vec{B} = B \hat{z}. This would create a magnetic flux through the x-y plane, and hence create an electric field in the \hat{\phi} direction from the Faraday law. But that means that \vec{S} \approx \hat{\phi} \times \hat{z} = \hat{r} and therefore there would be no angular momentum change in the fields.

I feel this is too simplistic and possibly wrong, especially since we didn't use any of iron's properties.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So as always I overcomplicate stuff. It is easy to just calculate L = N hbar/2, where N is the number of spin, given the density of iron. L = I w, where I is the moment of inertia. Super simple. Ugh.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top