Solving the Slinky Wave Problem: HELP!

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a slinky with a natural length of 3.00 meters, mass of 0.750 kg, and a spring constant of 18.0 N/m, which is stretched to a final length of 8.2 meters. The original poster seeks to determine the travel time of a transverse pulse sent through the slinky.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts various methods to find the speed of the pulse, expressing confusion about the relevance of amplitude and the correct length to use for calculations. Some participants question the use of the final length in calculations and suggest considering the difference between the stretched length and the natural length to find tension.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify the calculations for tension and speed of the wave. Some participants provide guidance on using the correct lengths for different types of wave speeds. There is a recognition of the need to differentiate between longitudinal and transverse wave speeds, but no explicit consensus is reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly identifying the distance the slinky is stretched and the implications of using the natural length versus the final length in calculations. The original poster expresses frustration over the problem, indicating a potential lack of understanding of the underlying concepts.

andkand97
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A slinky with natural length of 3.00 meters, mass of 0.750 kg, and spring constant 18.0 N/m is stretched out along a floor, each end held by a seated person. The final length is 8.2 m. One end is plucked sending a transverse pulse. Find the pulse's travel time there AND back.

Homework Equations


I've been stuck on this problem for hours. It is driving me insane. I don't understand how to find the speed if I don't know the amplitude. Is it the natural length of 3 meters? Even then I still get the wrong answer.

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried finding the solution multiple ways but still don't get the right answer. One method was using k = Ftension/x (8.2 m). Then putting that into v=squared root of F/(mass/length). Then used the velocity = wavelength * frequency to solve for frequency, took the inverse and multiplied by two.
PLEASE HELP! I've been working on this for hours! I'd really appreciate it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
andkand97 said:
The find length is 8.2 m
What is that supposed to say?
andkand97 said:
k = Ftension/x (8.2 m). Then putting that into v=squared root of F/(mass/length)
That looks right, except I'm not sure that 8.2m is the right length to be using. Depends on your answer to my first question.
 
haruspex said:
What is that supposed to say?

That looks right, except I'm not sure that 8.2m is the right length to be using. Depends on your answer to my first question.
Oh sorry. It's supposed to say the final length is 8.2 meters. As in the slinky is stretched to 8.2 m.
Sorry about that.
 
andkand97 said:
Oh sorry. It's supposed to say the final length is 8.2 meters. As in the slinky is stretched to 8.2 m.
Sorry about that.
OK, so how are you calculating the tension?
 
haruspex said:
OK, so how are you calculating the tension?
Well I have the spring constant and I have the distance it is stretched (8.2 m) so I do 18N/m = F/8.2m and solve for F. Is this not right? Or am I supposed to use the natural length instead?
 
andkand97 said:
the distance it is stretched (8.2 m)
That's not the distance it is stretched (by).
 
Oh...crap. So I subtract the natural length of 3 m from that then use it to find the tension, right?
 
andkand97 said:
Oh...crap. So I subtract the natural length of 3 m from that then use it to find the tension, right?
Yes. (But I think what you did gives the speed for ;longitudinal waves.)
 
How would I find the speed of a transverse wave?
 
  • #10
andkand97 said:
How would I find the speed of a transverse wave?
Sorry, I've confused you. I mean that using the extension (8.2-3) gives the transverse wave speed, but using the total length (as you did initially) gives the longitudinal speed.
 
  • #11
Oh okay. I finally got the right answer! Thank you so much I've been working on this since yesterday. Really appreciate it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K