Solving Torque Rock Problem: Force, Location & Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter aeroengphys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rock Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving torque and equilibrium with a steel rod supporting a baby moose. The rod is 6.0m long, with the moose weighing 2.0 kN and a person applying a downward force of 400N on the opposite end. The key to solving the problem lies in understanding the relationship between the forces and their distances from the fulcrum, which is the rock. The correct answer to the location of the rock is determined to be 1.0m from the moose, as indicated by the teacher. The discussion emphasizes the importance of torque calculations and the balance of forces in static equilibrium.
aeroengphys
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Someone places a 6.0m long steel rod on a rock so that one end is under a baby moose weighing 2.0 kN. THe person pushes down on the other end of the rod with a force of 400N, and the moose is held in the air at rest. The rock was:
(a) 1.0m from the moose
(b) 5.0m from the moose
(c) 1.0m from the person
(d) 6.0m from the person
(e) none of these


Homework Equations


T = Fl
Tnet = 0
Fnet = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



So I began this problem by drawing a free body diagram. I drew the 2000N moose on the right end of a rod that is balanced in the center by a rock. I drew that there are two forces acting in the downward direction, the 400N force and the 2000N W. Since I don't know the force applied on the rod by the rock, I made the center of gravity my axis of rotation. My teacher gave us the answers at the end of class, and said that the answer is (a). Is this because of the ratio between the forces of the moose and the person? How do you know that there's a relationship between the force applied and the location to which it's applied? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The torques are summed about the fulcrum for a lever. The rock is the fulcrum in this example.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top