Solving Two Bosons in a Box Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Henk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bosons Box
Henk
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I'm having some difficulties with the following problem:

Consider two (spinless)free bosons in a box of volume V with periodic boundary conditions. Let the momenta of the bosons be p and q.
a) Write down the normalized wavefunction for p is not equal to q and p = q.

\Psi_{pq}(r1,r2)

I thought since they are bosons Y has to be symmetric thus:

\Psi_{pq}(r1,r2) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\varphi_{p}(r1)\varphi_{q}(r2)+ \varphi_{p}(r2)\varphi_{q}(r1))

Where


\varphi_{p}(r1)\varphi_{q}(r2) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^3}(e^(i(p \cdot r1))(e^(i(q \cdot r2))


and


\varphi_{p}(r2)\varphi_{q}(r1) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^3}(e^(i(p \cdot r2))(e^(i(q \cdot r1))


For p=q this means:

\Psi_{pq}(r1,r2) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \frac{1}{(2\pi)^3}(2e^(i(k \cdot (r1+r2)))

b) Show that for p is not equal to q:

\Psi_{pq}(r,r)|^2 > |\Psi_{pp}(r,r)|^2

But I don't know how to do this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to fix your latex.
 
I tried but the weird thing is that it even gives a mistake if I try something simpel as \frac{1}{2}
 
try writing it without the stuff. Then people who know latex can at least read it with a bit of difficulty.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top