Automotive Some ideas for a CO2 emission reduction device to be attached to cars

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the development of a CO2 emission reduction device for automobiles, based on the active adsorption of CO2 on charcoal. Concerns were raised regarding the practicality of the design, including energy requirements for compressing CO2, the amount of charcoal needed, and the fate of the captured CO2. The proposed design involves increasing exhaust gas pressure to enhance adsorption, but participants pointed out that this could create significant back pressure, hindering vehicle performance. The feasibility of capturing a meaningful amount of CO2 from typical vehicle emissions was also questioned. Ultimately, the idea is seen as impractical for small-scale applications like cars, with suggestions to explore the underlying scientific principles instead.
Urmi Roy
Messages
743
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I and my team-mate have proposed an idea to develop a CO2 emission reduction device to be installed in automobiles.

We have mentioned that it will operate on the principle of 'active adsorption of CO2 on charcoal'.

However, although the basic scientific principle is pretty simple, we haveno idea of how to develop on this idea and come out with an idea to actually implement this idea: including how it will look (design), where it will be attached, how economic it will be etc.

Please give me some idea of what to do about it or give me some papers/links that are relevant.

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Some questions:
1. where's the energy to compress the CO2 come from? As not much of anything will be adsorbed by simply passing the exhaust through (activated) carbon.
2. how much charcoal will you need to store a useful amount of CO2? And how much will room does it need/how much does it weigh?
3. once you have all this adsorbed CO2, what do you suggest doing with it? - You could bury the charcoal, Terra-preta style; but you would probably offset more atmospheric-CO2 by running the vehicle as efficiently as possible and 'digging-in' a little extra char.

If this is along the lines of a coal-fired power station, fitted with Carbon Capture & Storage then be aware that the economies of scale on a car are far too small to still have an energy 'overhead' to power such a process. IMO, it's a fairly dire idea on a huge power-plant, but it's really, unimaginably bad on a small automobile.

My apologies, though, if I've completely got the wrong end of the stick with this.
 
Hi rethunk,

THanks a lot for your critical review, it made us look into the matter a lot deeper :-)

We looked into the details you mentioned and it seems that we'll not need an awful lot of activated charcoal for the purpose. We've also looked up on some possible uses of the adsorbant after the whole thing is over.

Finally, we made a design, the picture of which I'm attaching here.
One question is that we want to increase the pressure of the exhaust gases so that the adsorption rates can be increased. Since decreasing the velocity will lead to an increase in pressure, we were planning to add an air/water bladder which will expand as the air flows in thereby compressing the in-flowing gases.

Also, in case its easier for you to understand, I'll just mention that basically the exhaust gas is made to fall on the activated charcoal (adsorbant) and it loses its momentum upon colliding with the adsorbant (which is put vertically to increase momentum loss). We've put a nozzle to restrict the flow of the gases.

Thanks a lot!

Regards,
Urmi.
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0132.jpg
    IMAG0132.jpg
    17.2 KB · Views: 462
Two things spring to mind.

1. An exhaust is designed to get rid of the gases (obvious, I know but bear with me ;)). This is adding what sounds like a very large restriction on that, and in general everything i the exhause is designed to reduce the flow restriction to prevent back pressure.

2. The average fleet car puts out 120g CO2/ km. Even if this becomes a service item, 10k km. The amount of CO2 thoughput is 1200kg.

Realisitically what proportion do you expect to capture?


Just some food for thought.
 
xxChrisxx said:
1. An exhaust is designed to get rid of the gases (obvious, I know but bear with me ;)). This is adding what sounds like a very large restriction on that, and in general everything i the exhause is designed to reduce the flow restriction to prevent back pressure.

I once had a catalytic converter fail and block the exhaust system with the debris.

That was a VERY effective way to reduce CO2 emissions. The engine would not run at all, except at idle speed with no load. That wasn't very useful for transportation, but it didn't generate much pollution!
 
The best way to reduce CO2 emissions from a car is to walk...

Seriously though, it sounds ike you got the idea from a pressure vessel filter and thought it'd be funny on a car. Your idea wouldn't work, but it'd be a good project to explain why and calculate the conditions that it creates and why combusiton won't occur inside the engine.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Back
Top