Some questions about a VTOL UAV design

  • Thread starter Thread starter harralk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design Uav
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the design of a VTOL UAV, weighing 15-20 lbs and featuring four ducted fans capable of 12 lbs static thrust each. Concerns about ground effects and the power required for hovering at 10 feet for 20 minutes are highlighted, with an emphasis on the necessity of testing to determine actual performance. Thrust vectoring is considered for maneuverability, but it raises concerns about added weight from additional mechanisms. The initial need for thrust vectoring was reconsidered, as minimal pitch and roll adjustments are sufficient to keep terrain mapping sensors stable. Ultimately, testing will be crucial to validate the UAV's lift-off capability and power requirements.
harralk
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a VTOL UAV with some upper classmen and I'm wondering if the design so far will be able to lift off the ground, and how much power (battery power that is) it'll need to hover at about 10 feet for 20 minutes. My concern is with ground effects and the amount of raw power needed to get the thing to lift off.

Weight: 15-20lbs
Height: 10 inches
Diameter: ~18 inches
Propulsion: 4x 127mm ducted fans, each rated at up to 12lbs static thrust (presumably at sea level)

Also, if it's not too much to ask, I'm curious about using thrust vectoring to steer/propel the UAV instead of the old-fashioned tilt-and-twist method

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • larva uav1.jpg
    larva uav1.jpg
    15.6 KB · Views: 518
  • larva uav3.jpg
    larva uav3.jpg
    17.9 KB · Views: 518
Physics news on Phys.org
Its almost impossible to predetermine in ground effects. This is where trial and error comes into play. Just looking at the numbers i'd say you're ok but no way to tell until you test.
Also thrust vectoring a quadrotor is doable but now you're adding unnecessary weight for additional actuation mechanisms. How do you plan to implement it, and why would you want to vector it?
 
I had the same feeling about the extra weight of vectored thrust, why I first thought about removing it. Initially it was seen as a necessity because the terrain mapping sensors onboard need to be kept stable while they process visual data. After looking into it I found out the airframe only needs to pitch/roll a few tenths of a degree to maneuver around which won't interfere with the sensors.
 
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
Back
Top