Spacetime Inverval Invariance using Lorentz Transformations

maccyjj
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that the spacetime interval
-(ct)^{2} + x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2}
is invariant.

[/itex]<br /> <h2>Homework Equations</h2><br /> Lorentz transformations<br /> \Deltax&amp;#039; = \gamma(\Deltax-u\Deltat)<br /> \Deltay&amp;#039; = \Deltay<br /> \Deltaz&amp;#039; = \Deltaz<br /> \Deltat&amp;#039; = \gamma(\Deltat-u\Deltax/c^{2})<br /> <br /> <br /> <h2>The Attempt at a Solution</h2><br /> I have tried to prove that \Delta S = \Delta S&amp;#039;<br /> So first I said that \Delta S&amp;#039; = - \Delta (ct&amp;#039;)^{2} + \Delta (x&amp;#039;)^{2} + \Delta (y&amp;#039;)^{2} + \Delta (z&amp;#039;)^{2}<br /> <br /> And inserted all the Lorentz Transformations above into the above formula.<br /> <br /> I end up simplyfying it to get<br /> <br /> \gamma^{2} (x^{2} + u^{2}t^{2} - c^{2}t^{2} - \frac{u^{2}x^{2}}{c^{2}}) + y^{2} + z^{2}<br /> <br /> How does this equal S = - \Delta (ct)^{2} \Delta (x)^{2} + \Delta (y)^{2} + \Delta (z)^{2} ? I can&#039;t see a way to get rid of the extra terms to get this simple function.<br /> <br /> Any help would be really really great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you collect the terms, you'll see that the coefficient of x2 is \gamma^2(1-u^2/c^2). Use the definition of \gamma to simplify that.
 
Oh of course! How did I miss that?

Thank you so much I got it out now!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top