Astrofiend
- 36
- 0
Homework Statement
OK - the problem is thus:
In an inertial frame two observers (called a & b) travel along the positive x-axis with velocities Va and Vb. They encounter a photon traveling in the opposite x-direction. Without using the Lorentz transformations, show that the ratio of the energies of the photon observed by observers a & b is given by:
<br /> <br /> \frac{E_a}{E_b} = \sqrt{\frac{1+V_a}{1+V_b}.\frac{1-V_b}{1-V_a}}<br /> <br />
Homework Equations
<br /> <br /> E_o = -p_o.u_o<br /> <br />
where E_o is the observed energy of a photon with 4-momentum p_0, by a given observer moving with 4-velocity u_o.
I set up the 4-velocities of observers a & b as:
<br /> <br /> u^\alpha_a = (\gamma_a,\gamma__a V_a ,0,0)<br /> <br />
<br /> <br /> u^\alpha_b = (\gamma_b,\gamma__b V_b ,0,0)<br /> <br />
and the 4-momentum of the photon as:
<br /> <br /> p^\alpha = (p^t,p^x, 0,0)<br /> <br />
The Attempt at a Solution
With these 4-vectors set up, the energies of the photon for each observer should just be the dot product of each 4-velocity with the negative of the 4-momentum of the photon - i.e:
<br /> <br /> E_o = -p_\alpha .u^\alpha = - \eta_\alpha_\beta p^\alpha .u^\alpha<br />
where \eta_\alpha_\beta is the metric.
so
<br /> E_a = \gamma_a p_t + \gamma_a V_a p_x \\<br />
<br /> E_b = \gamma_b p_t + \gamma_b V_b p_x<br />
Then, I used the fact that for a photon,
<br /> p^\alpha.p^\alpha = 0 \\<br />
<br /> i.e. -p_t^2+ p_x^2 = 0 \\<br />
so
<br /> p_t = p_x<br />
and we get:
E_a = \gamma_a p_t + \gamma_a V_a p_t = \gamma_a p_t (1+V_a) \\<br />
<br /> E_b = \gamma_b p_t + \gamma_b V_b p_t = \gamma_b p_t (1+V_b) \\<br />
so
<br /> \frac{E_a}{E_b} = \frac{\sqrt{1-V_b^2}(1+V_a)}{\sqrt{1-V_a^2}(1+V_b)}<br />
...which is where I'm falling down. As I said before, I'm after the relation
<br /> <br /> \frac{E_a}{E_b} = \sqrt{\frac{1+V_a}{1+V_b}.\frac{1-V_b}{1-V_a}}<br /> <br />
Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong? Have I made a mistake somewhere, or is there some mathematical trick to take me further from where I am to the required answer? I've stared at this for a while now and can't work out why it's falling down.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Last edited: