Special Relativity 4-vector problem - Doing my head in

Astrofiend
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



OK - the problem is thus:

In an inertial frame two observers (called a & b) travel along the positive x-axis with velocities Va and Vb. They encounter a photon traveling in the opposite x-direction. Without using the Lorentz transformations, show that the ratio of the energies of the photon observed by observers a & b is given by:

<br /> <br /> \frac{E_a}{E_b} = \sqrt{\frac{1+V_a}{1+V_b}.\frac{1-V_b}{1-V_a}}<br /> <br />

Homework Equations



<br /> <br /> E_o = -p_o.u_o<br /> <br />

where E_o is the observed energy of a photon with 4-momentum p_0, by a given observer moving with 4-velocity u_o.

I set up the 4-velocities of observers a & b as:

<br /> <br /> u^\alpha_a = (\gamma_a,\gamma__a V_a ,0,0)<br /> <br />
<br /> <br /> u^\alpha_b = (\gamma_b,\gamma__b V_b ,0,0)<br /> <br />

and the 4-momentum of the photon as:

<br /> <br /> p^\alpha = (p^t,p^x, 0,0)<br /> <br />

The Attempt at a Solution



With these 4-vectors set up, the energies of the photon for each observer should just be the dot product of each 4-velocity with the negative of the 4-momentum of the photon - i.e:

<br /> <br /> E_o = -p_\alpha .u^\alpha = - \eta_\alpha_\beta p^\alpha .u^\alpha<br />

where \eta_\alpha_\beta is the metric.

so

<br /> E_a = \gamma_a p_t + \gamma_a V_a p_x \\<br />

<br /> E_b = \gamma_b p_t + \gamma_b V_b p_x<br />

Then, I used the fact that for a photon,

<br /> p^\alpha.p^\alpha = 0 \\<br />

<br /> i.e. -p_t^2+ p_x^2 = 0 \\<br />

so

<br /> p_t = p_x<br />

and we get:

E_a = \gamma_a p_t + \gamma_a V_a p_t = \gamma_a p_t (1+V_a) \\<br />

<br /> E_b = \gamma_b p_t + \gamma_b V_b p_t = \gamma_b p_t (1+V_b) \\<br />

so

<br /> \frac{E_a}{E_b} = \frac{\sqrt{1-V_b^2}(1+V_a)}{\sqrt{1-V_a^2}(1+V_b)}<br />

...which is where I'm falling down. As I said before, I'm after the relation

<br /> <br /> \frac{E_a}{E_b} = \sqrt{\frac{1+V_a}{1+V_b}.\frac{1-V_b}{1-V_a}}<br /> <br />

Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong? Have I made a mistake somewhere, or is there some mathematical trick to take me further from where I am to the required answer? I've stared at this for a while now and can't work out why it's falling down.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I think I botched the dot product earlier between the 4-vels and the 4-mom. I think it should give me:

<br /> E_a = \gamma_a p_t - \gamma_a V_a p_t = \gamma_a p_t (1-V_a) \\<br />

<br /> E_b = \gamma_b p_t - \gamma_b V_b p_t = \gamma_b p_t (1-V_b) \\<br />

as opposed to:

<br /> E_a = \gamma_a p_t + \gamma_a V_a p_t = \gamma_a p_t (1+V_a) \\<br />

<br /> E_b = \gamma_b p_t + \gamma_b V_b p_t = \gamma_b p_t (1+V_b) \\<br />

i.e. with minus signs, not the plusses I have before. But this seems to take me even further away from where I want to be. Arrg!

Help!
 
Astrofiend said:
<br /> \frac{E_a}{E_b} = \frac{\sqrt{1-V_b^2}(1+V_a)}{\sqrt{1-V_a^2}(1+V_b)}<br />

...which is where I'm falling down. As I said before, I'm after the relation

<br /> <br /> \frac{E_a}{E_b} = \sqrt{\frac{1+V_a}{1+V_b}.\frac{1-V_b}{1-V_a}}<br /> <br />

Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong?

Nothing is wrong. These two expressions are equal. It's easier to see this by squaring each expression, then using 1-V^2 = (1-V)(1+V).
 
Ah - thanks heaps. I'll work through it!

Cheers.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top