Special relativity assignment - pole moving in two dimensions

luisf
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi!
I'm a bit stuck with this special relativity assignment, here's is the problem:
In a frame S a pole moves in the x-direction at speed v such that \gamma(v)=3 and in the negative y-direction at speed w, while remaining parallel to the x-axis and being of apparent length 6 ft. The centre of the pole passes the centre of a 9-ft hole in a plate that coincides with the plane y=0. Explain, from the point of view of the usual second frame S' moving with velocity v relative to S, how the pole gets trough the now 3-ft hole.

So the problem here is that not only does the hole shrink in S', as stated in the problem description, the pole should also be wider by a factor of 3 in this frame. So we have an 18 ft wide pole that has to move through a 3 ft wide hole. Since it will obviously fit through the hole in S, there must be an explanation for how it would fit in S' and usually there's some quirk of some physical law that will just take care of things. I can't really think of any law that would aid me in this situation however, the only explanation I can think of is that the pole is perhaps skewed in S' because of length contraction in both x- and y-direction. I'm not at all sure how that would work though, hopefully I could get some guidance from you guys.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See if the ends of the pole will pass through the opening.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top