Special relativity: proof of symmetry concept

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that the product of a symmetric tensor A and an antisymmetric tensor B results in zero, specifically A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}=0. The confusion arises when attempting to manipulate the indices of B, as changing them should introduce a sign change due to its antisymmetry. The lecturer suggests using index interchange, leading to the conclusion that A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu} equals itself with opposite signs, thus resulting in zero. Participants clarify that the summation over indices from 1 to 4 is crucial to understanding the proof. Ultimately, the key point is recognizing that the antisymmetry of B ensures the product with the symmetric A yields a net result of zero.
Uku
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am given a symmetric tensor A, meaning A^{\mu\nu}=A^{\nu\mu} and I am given an asymmetric tensor B, meaning B_{\mu\nu}=-B_{\nu\mu}

Now I need to show that:

A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}=0 0)

Homework Equations



We know that an asymmetric tensor can be written as:

A^{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}(T^{\mu\nu}-T^{\nu\mu}) 1)

The Attempt at a Solution


This is what I have written down from the class:

We can use 1) to write:

B_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}(B_{\mu\nu}-B_{\nu\mu})

Now we multiply this by A^{\mu\nu}:

A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}(A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}-A^{\mu\nu}B_{\nu\mu}) 2)

Here comes the point which I am confused: the lecturer has written that we can use
\mu\leftrightarrow\nu 3) to change the indexes on 2) such as:

A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}(A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}-A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu})=\frac{1}{2}A^{\mu\nu}(B_{\mu\nu}-B_{\mu\nu})=0 4)

Right, but here is the question. I know that tensor B is antisymmetric, meaning that
B_{\mu\nu}=-B_{\nu\mu}! How can I then use 3) to change the indexes? That should give me a change of signs in 4)

...=\frac{1}{2}(B_{\mu\nu}+B_{\mu\nu})\neq0

So... how is 0) properly shown? Have I missed some principle at 3)?

EDIT: Is it just that in 4) -B_{\nu\mu}=B_{\mu\nu} ? But that does not work either... because if I plug that in, then I still get B+B
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Uku said:

Homework Statement



I am given a symmetric tensor A, meaning A^{\mu\nu}=A^{\nu\mu} and I am given an asymmetric tensor B, meaning B_{\mu\nu}=-B_{\nu\mu}
That's an "anti-symmetric" tensor. Any tensor that is not symmetric is an "asymmetric" tensor.

Now I need to show that:

A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}=0 0)

Homework Equations



We know that an asymmetric tensor can be written as:

A^{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}(T^{\mu\nu}-T^{\nu\mu}) 1)

The Attempt at a Solution


This is what I have written down from the class:

We can use 1) to write:

B_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}(B_{\mu\nu}-B_{\nu\mu})

Now we multiply this by A^{\mu\nu}:

A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}(A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}-A^{\mu\nu}B_{\nu\mu}) 2)

Here comes the point which I am confused: the lecturer has written that we can use
\mu\leftrightarrow\nu 3) to change the indexes on 2) such as:

A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}(A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}-A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu})=\frac{1}{2}A^{\mu\nu}(B_{\mu\nu}-B_{\mu\nu})=0 4)

Right, but here is the question. I know that tensor B is antisymmetric, meaning that
B_{\mu\nu}=-B_{\nu\mu}! How can I then use 3) to change the indexes? That should give me a change of signs in 4)

...=\frac{1}{2}(B_{\mu\nu}+B_{\mu\nu})\neq0

So... how is 0) properly shown? Have I missed some principle at 3)?

EDIT: Is it just that in 4) -B_{\nu\mu}=B_{\mu\nu} ? But that does not work either... because if I plug that in, then I still get B+B

Do you understand that A^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu} is sum[/b}? That we are summing over \mu= 1 to 4 and \nu= 1 to 4?
 
Yes I do. I figure you gave me a hint there, I'll look at the problem again.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top