Specific Heat Capacity of Ice, Help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the specific heat capacity of ice using provided data on mass, temperatures, and specific heat capacities of water and copper. Initial calculations yielded a value of approximately 1604.635 J kg-1K-1, which is lower than the expected range of 2000-2100 J kg-1K-1. Participants emphasized the importance of including the heat transfer from both the water and the copper calorimeter in the calculations. A revised approach led to a new estimate of 2194 J kg-1K, aligning more closely with known values. The conversation highlights the need for careful consideration of all components in heat exchange to achieve accurate results.
Prototype07
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The following data is obtained:
Weight of ice cube added 20 g
Weight of copper calorimeter 80.5 g
Weight of water in calorimeter 105 g
Initial temp of ice cube -18 deg C
Initial temp of water 23 deg C
Final temp of water 6 deg C
Specific Heat Capacity copper 385 J kg-1K-1
Specific Heat Capacity water 4185 J kg-1K-1
Specific Latent Heat Fusion of Ice 335 kJ kg-1

Calculate a value for the Specific Heat Capacity of ice in J kg-1K-1.

Homework Equations



Q= Mass x Specific Heat Capacity x change in temperature

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried countless attempts and literally spent hours trying to work this out, all have pointed to dead ends and I really don't know what else to try...
20g = 0.02kg
335kJ = 335000 J
105g = 0.105kg

(0.02kg x 335000J kg-1) + (0.02kg x c) x (6 - -18) = (0.105kg x 4185J kg-1K-1) x (23 - 6)
6700 + (0.02 x c) x 24 = 439.425 x 17
6700 + (0.02 x c) x 24 = 7470.225
0.02 x c x 24 = 770.225
c = 770.225 / (0.02 x 24)
c = 1604.635 J kg-1K-1

Now, I need to work out the SHC of ice which, pre-calculations, we should know it as being around 2000-2100, right? So surely that should mean 1604 is incorrect?
I've really got no idea what to do anymore, should I have included the SHC of copper and the mass of the calorimeter into the equation somewhere too?
Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to consider that your system doesn't exchange heat with the universe, or in other words \delta Q_{U}=0, so all you have to do now is consider every component in the system that exchanges heat inside the system.

In a general form it would be something like this:

\delta Q_U=\delta Q_{Water}+\delta Q_{Ice} + \delta Q_{Copper}=0

Remember the system is in thermal equilibrium in the final stage, so you can solve it for the variable you need.

Hope this helps.

Note: \delta Q = Q.
 
Right, I -think- I made some progress
Assuming the specific heat capacity of copper is calculated to be 536.87
Q=m x c x delta t
therefore: Q = 0.0805 x 385 x 17
Q = 526.87

Would it then make sense to add this value to the current value of 1604.635
resulting in 2131.505?
This would seem to then confirm the assumed value of 2100..?
 
Well what I tried with this problem is:

Q_ice = -(Q_water + Q_copper)

Assuming that the copper changes temperature in the same way as the water inside of it, which is a fairly reasonably assumption or the temperatures wouldn't settle in the ways stated, this gives the heat transfer equation as

(m_ice x dT_ice x C_ice) + ( L_ice x m_ice) + (m_ice x C_water x dT'_ice) = -[(m_water x C_water x dT_water) + (m_copper x C_copper x dT_copper)]

Plugging in the numbers and rearranging gives me a value of C_ice at 2194 J/kgK.

P.S. Sorry for the screwy notation. Underscores indicate subscript, d is delta (or change in), m is mass, T is temperature, C is specific heat capacity, L is latent heat of fusion

EDIT: I forgot to mention, dT_ice is 18 degrees because it goes from -18 to 0 to melt, and dT'_ice is 6 because it then goes from 0 to 6 degrees before reaching equilibrium.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top