Specific Heat of a nonlinear, temperature dependent spring

Infernorage
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A nonlinear spring has a temperature dependent force law,

F = -\frac{K}{T}(L-L_o)^3

At a temperature T = T_o and length L = L_o the specific heat at a constant length is C_L = C_o. What is the specific heat at T = T_o when the spring is stretched to length 2L_o?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am really not sure where to start. Am I supposed to use the general dU=dQ-dW equation and somehow work the spring into that using the force equation and then solve for a specific heat equation? Any advice would be great. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the force is the negative gradien of its potential energy, in a one dimensional case as this we can write,

F=-\frac{dU}{dL} or

U=-\int FdL

Once obtained the potential energy, use the defenition of the heat capacity at constant length,

C_L=(\frac{dU}{dT})_L

With the given information you should be able to express your result in terms of C_o.
 
K space said:
Since the force is the negative gradien of its potential energy, in a one dimensional case as this we can write,

F=-\frac{dU}{dL} or

U=-\int FdL

Once obtained the potential energy, use the defenition of the heat capacity at constant length,

C_L=(\frac{dU}{dT})_L

With the given information you should be able to express your result in terms of C_o.

If you do that doesn't C_L=(\frac{dU}{dT})_L come out to be C_L = -\frac{K}{4T^2}(L-L_o)^4? How can you have a negative specific heat?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top