Spectrochemical series explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathewsMD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explanation Series
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the arrangement of ligands in the spectrochemical series and the factors influencing crystal field splitting. Larger anions, such as I-, are positioned lower due to their inability to cause significant splitting in d orbitals, resulting in a low Δo. The confusion arises with ligands like OH-, which is placed lower than expected despite its anionic nature, while neutral ligands like H2O and NH3 exhibit different splitting effects. The conversation highlights the importance of considering covalent interactions alongside electrostatic ones when evaluating ligand behavior. Clarifications and additional resources on these concepts are sought to better understand the spectrochemical series.
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
After learning about crystal field theory, my main question was due to the arrangement of the molecules in the spectrochemical series. I can understand that the larger anions are placed towards the lower end since they do not cause high splitting in the d orbitals, but some of the arrangements of the molecules confuse me. My reasoning is largely due to the size of the molecules. For ions like I-, they have a large ionic radius and cannot pair well with the central metal well. This results in a low Δo. I can also see that CO is smaller and since it is not charged, the lone pair electrons on the oxygen atom can yield high splitting without being repelled by the outer electrons too much. My primary question is why OH- is not towards the end with higher Δo. Any clarification or corrections to what I have posted would be greatly appreciated. Also, any links or another explanation for the arrangement of the molecules on the spectrochemical series would be amazing!

Thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Any help on how to distinguish b/w strong and weak field splitting ligands w/o the aid of a spectrochemical series?
 
If splitting of d orbitals resulted simply from the effect of point charges (ions or dipoles), one should expect that anionic ligands would exert the greatest effect. To the contrary, most anionic ligands lie at the low end of the spectrochemical series. Furthermore, OH- lie below neutral H2O molecule and NH3 produces a greater splitting than H2O although the dipole moments are in reverse order.
This is due to the assumption of purely electrostatic interactions between ligands and central metal ions. In fact, covalent interactions between metal ions and ligands have to be taken into account.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
I'm trying to find a cheap DIY method to etch holes of various shapes through 0.3mm Aluminium sheet using 5-10% Sodium Hydroxide. The idea is to apply a resist to the Aluminium then selectively ablate it off using a diode laser cutter and then dissolve away the Aluminium using Sodium Hydroxide. By cheap I mean resists costing say £20 in small quantities. The Internet has suggested various resists to try including... Enamel paint (only survived seconds in the NaOH!) Acrylic paint (only...
Back
Top