Speed of a pendulum at the bottom

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fontseeker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a pendulum at its lowest point using conservation of energy. The initial potential energy is converted entirely into kinetic energy at the bottom, leading to the equation (1/2)mv^2 = mgh. The height h is expressed in terms of the pendulum's length L and displacement x as h = (L^2 - x^2)^(1/2). The derived velocity formula is v = (2g * (L^2 - x^2)^(1/2))^(1/2), but there is uncertainty about its alignment with provided answer choices. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying the height in the context of the problem.
Fontseeker
Messages
30
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



tnrkrbS7.jpg


Homework Equations



U = (1/2)kx^2
T = 2 * π * (m/k)^ (1/2)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I said that the angular velocity is

w = (2 * π) / t

And the equation for velocity would be:

v(t) = -Aw * cos (w * t)

However, I don't know how to relate this to the speed at the bottom. I was thinking of using conservation of energy, but I don't have the height.
 

Attachments

  • tnrkrbS7.jpg
    tnrkrbS7.jpg
    8.7 KB · Views: 2,051
Physics news on Phys.org
The conservation of energy will work. The potential energy + the kinetic energy = the total energy is a constant. If you take the potential energy as zero at the bottom of the path, the total energy at that point is all kinetic energy. If you start from rest, the total energy at the start is all potential energy. So the kinetic energy at the bottom is equal to the potential energy at the start. You know that the potential energy is mgh and the kinetic energy is mv^2/2 so all you need to do is determine what h is in terms of the parameters of the problem.
 
Fontseeker said:
I don't have the height.
Ask Pythagoras for help on that one.

Alternatively, you can rule out all but one of the answers quite quickly.
 
haruspex said:
Ask Pythagoras for help on that one.

Alternatively, you can rule out all but one of the answers quite quickly.

Alright, so if I use conservation of energy:

(1/2)mv^2 = mgh
v = (2gh)^(1/2)

The height would be h = (L^2 -x^2)^(1/2)
so the Velocity = (2g * (L^2 -x^2)^(1/2))^(1/2)

That doesn't show up on the answers.
 
Fontseeker said:
The height would be h = (L^2 -x^2)^(1/2)
Not quite. Look again.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
2K
Back
Top