Speed of Ships -- Special Relativity

Barry Melby
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Galaxy A moves away from galaxy B at 0.650 c0 relative to B. A spaceship leaves a planet in galaxy A traveling at 0.550 c0 relative to galaxy A. If the direction in which the ship travels is the same as the direction in which A is moving away from B, what do observers in B measure for the ship's speed?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


I thought that the speed would be .550c , but this appears to be incorrect. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That would be slower than galaxy A is moving.

What do you know about velocity addition?
 
From B's point of view, A is moving away at 0.65c. Since the spaceship is moving away from A in the direction of B at 0.55c, B will see the ship move away - but not as fast as 0.65c.
 
.Scott said:
From B's point of view, A is moving away at 0.65c. Since the spaceship is moving away from A in the direction of B at 0.55c, B will see the ship move away - but not as fast as 0.65c.
I don't think that is right. I believe the ship is moving in the opposite direction from A.
 
PeroK said:
I don't think that is right. I believe the ship is moving in the opposite direction from A.
If the direction in which the ship travels is the same as the direction in which A is moving away from B
You're right. So it's simple relativistic addition.
Just make sure 0.65+0.55<1
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top