Speed with a de Broglie wavelength.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the speed of an electron based on its de Broglie wavelength using the formula λ = h/mv. A participant encountered an implausibly high speed of 4.54 x 10^27 m/s, which exceeds the speed of light, indicating a calculation error. The correct approach involves considering relativistic effects, as indicated by the formula λ = h/(mγv). An alternative calculation using 2.77 x 10^8 m/s yields a wavelength of 2.63 x 10^-12 m, suggesting potential issues with the original question. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate calculations and the need to account for relativistic speeds in quantum mechanics.
elephantorz
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
1. At what speed is an electron's de Broglie wavelength:
(a) 1.0 pm
(b) 1.0 nm
(c) 1.0 \mum
(d) 1.0 mm
2. \lambda = \frac{h}{mv}
3. I have solved for v, and I plugged in values, it gives me, for a = 4.54 x 10^(27) m/s, the ANSWER is: 2.77 x 10^(8) ms, it's way off, I tried converting energy into Js it also did not work, what am I overlooking?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it possible that my teacher is wrong? I think she copied down her answer wrong on my paper...
 
I am not sure on this one, should you perhaps take into account the relativistic speed?
\lambda = \frac{h}{m \gamma v}

For a I get:
v = \frac{h}{m \lambda} = \frac{6.63 \times 10^{-34}}{(9.109 \times 10^{-31})(1\times 10^{-12})} = 7.28 \times 10^8 \text{m/s}
This is higher than the speed of light and can therefore never be correct.


Your answer of 4.54 x 10^27 m/s is ridiculously high. The answer can NEVER be more than the speed of light which is approximately 3.0 x 10^8 m/s.


EDIT
Using 2.77 x 10^8 as the speed, you get a wavelength of 2.63 x 10^-12 m or 2.63 ps. Something wrong with the question maybe?
 
Last edited:
The formula with the relativistic momentum in Nick89's post will give the correct answer.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top