Sphere falling through viscous material - velcoity calc

Bakery87
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm dropping a sphere from a known height, and it enters a viscous fluid. I know the initial velocity as it enters the fluid, from there I need the velocity as it falls through the fluid (as a function of time).

I know it should approach it's settling velocity (terminal velocity) and from there I can use stokes law to get the terminal velocity. What I need is the velocity as it approaches that point. Assuming no spin of the sphere. I know the fluid's density and viscosity, sphere density, and initial velocity as it enters the fluid.

I can find this equation for a skydiver falling through the air, but since the air has very little viscosity it does not contribute to the buoyancy of the skydiver.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't think about terminal velocity from the start. Just find out the velocity as a function of time. I remember there is an exponential term in it. If you substitute t as infinity in the equation, you get the terminal velocity.

Hint- Its acceleration will not be constant. From Newton's second law Fnet = ma, here a=dv/dt.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top